Sentences with phrase «infinite regress»
Infinite regress refers to a situation where something keeps going on forever, leading to no clear ending or solution. It often implies a never-ending loop or chain of events, ideas, or arguments that cannot be resolved. It suggests a continuous series without reaching a final conclusion. Full definition
Then please explain to me (avoiding infinite regress) how the cause of the physical universe could be itself physical.
religion.blogs.cnn.com
Such a conclusion might throw me into infinite regress as I absorb the inescapable contradictions that brought me there.
Three of Aquinas» proofs involve infinite regress and there is no reason to think that god provides a terminator, much less the Christian god or any other god.
God, conversly, has to deal with infinite regress a lot more than anything else.
Lot's of simplistic infinite regress posts... but no one addressing the issue... well a couple of you did.
But it does not, however, permit us to postulate after the fashion of pan-psychism or dialectical materialism or thorough - going psycho - physical parallelism, a similar unity of relation between subject and object for every particular item met with within this unity, for that would clearly introduce a meaningless infinite regress or would once more annul the dualism found within the unity.
I realize there's no proof of this whatsoever, just don't see how a continual infinite regress in any way proves that there was no «first mover», or «God», or whatever we're calling it.
If physical immanence were abandoned for either a relationship of one over many, or by likeness, a «Third Man» infinite regress seemed to break out.
His book Infinite Regress: Marcel Duchamp, 1910 - 1941 was published by MIT in 1998.
Ian James and Katie Shapiro Infinite Regress ltd los angeles 7561 W. Sunset Blvd # 103, Los Angeles, CA 90046 January 8 — 22, 2016 Reception: January 9, 7 - 10 pm
Simultaneously pictured and reframed in Kessler's sculpture Infinite Regress, spectators render themselves as nodes within a feedback network, the space a physical support for their virtual daydreams.
We have to go to the disaster that encompasses the black family, the failure to close educational achievement gaps, the rise of worklessness among black males, the increase in crime, and, behind all these, there are other factors in infinite regress.
Avoiding infinite regress, there couldn't be an infinite series of causes for our physical universe, so whatever this cause was, it was eternal and un-caused.
So by your own logic, the designer would have to have a designer and that designer would have to have a designer and you just get into an infinite regress.
A multiverse STILL must have a beginning or it faces the problem of the infinite regress.
Next, a multiverse is only one theory and in a way you are correct that infinite regress can be found within, but I don't think the multiverse is true, holy writ and infallible, its just a possibilty.
Do you believe an infinite regress is possible?
You can't have an infinite regress.
Do you believe that an infinite regress is possible?
What is agreed upon is that the self - consciousness involved in the satisfaction of an actual entity can not have the status of knowledge (for knowledge refers us to reflection, and hence to an additional process), nor can it have the structure of intentionality (for intentional self - awareness fractures unity and leads to an infinite regress).
Sorry, but «infinite regress» also doesn't really prove anything.
Besides, if nothing can exist without being created, then we just push the explanation farther up the ladder (the infinite regress conundrum).
To avoid an infinite regress we must affirm a being that is the cause of its own necessity.
You can not have an infinite regress - there had to be an initial cause.
Or I can posit a reality of turtles all the way down, there's an infinite regress of causes.
This infinite regress would not be satisfactory.
Von Neumann mentioned that eventually this leads to an infinite regress, because there is always a further classical world.
Your «proof» claims that infinite regress is not possible, but this is an naked assertion.
But we say all C is actually Q, and this leads us into C» C»,... an infinite regress.]
This leads to the problem of an infinite regress.
Share that word around, you can pull it out like «infinite regress» and «first cause» to awkwardly try to conflate the real world with the magical world.
The «un-caused cause» is the typical solution to the infinite regress required of theist's initial premise.
To avoid infinite regress, it's creator must be eternal.
Otherwise you have infinite regress.
Have you ever explained why you think we can't have infinite regress?