But throughout it all, there were no mentions of the dramatic increases in extreme weather and no mentions of
the influence of a warming planet on extreme storms like Sandy.
Not exact matches
Given that many claim humans are
influencing global
warming and the number
of people that now are on the
planet I do not know how a thinking person can not see that most
of us have to change our focus on consuming animal products.
Through the scenario
of an adventure game, pupils make lifestyle choices which can
influence global
warming, air pollution, deforestation and the future
of planet Earth.
James E. Hansen, the head
of Goddard and an outspoken campaigner for prompt cuts in greenhouse - gas emissions, explained that the decades - long global
warming trend and patterns
of warming remain consistent with a growing
influence on climate from the
planet's building blanket
of heat - trapping greenhouse gases.
As I wrote in my first book on global
warming, in 1992, we are the first life form we know
of on Earth that has risen to be a
planet - scale
influence and is also aware
of that fact — or slowly absorbing it.
In environmental circles there is a clear and correct recognition
of the fact that the
planet is
warming at an astounding pace, yet, there is a perplexing denial
of the ongoing climate engineering insanity (which is mathematically the greatest single negative
influence on the climate system overall).
Somehow, I don't think that's what you're saying when you write things like «The true null [is] that there is no evidence
of human
influence warming the
planet dangerously.»
The true null — that there is no evidence
of human
influence warming the
planet dangerously — may be compatible with «natural variation drives the climate», and indeed incompatible with «human activity is dangerously
warming the
planet» but they are not logically identical.
Brooke C. Medley, a postdoctoral fellow with NASA who contributed to one
of the new papers on Antarctic ice loss, said the findings demonstrate that the
planet's large ice sheets, which were once thought to be stable, are responding to global
warming and other
influences at a rapid rate.
To express uncertainty over humans»
influence on the climate, Foran points out, is to be out
of line with 97 percent
of scientists — those forming the overwhelming consensus — who agree that the
planet is
warming and that humans are the primary cause.
The Great Plains States in the middle
of the US, in a
warming planet that is under the
influence of an amplified Hadley Cell) would need to get its precipitation from the Subtropical jet.
In 1995, the IPCC had already concluded — based on work by Ben Santer and other leading climate scientists working on the problem
of climate change «detection and attribution» — that there was already now a «discernible human
influence» on the
warming of the
planet.
In its first comprehensive report since winning a Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, the IPCC is unequivocal about the
influence of human activity, the progressive
warming of the
planet, the melting
of the polar ice caps, and the rise in sea level.
But this cooling
influence was offset by CO2 levels estimated to have been in the range
of 1,200 to 1,800 ppm, enough to keep the
planet very
warm indeed.