Hypothesis 1: Human
influence on climate variability and change is of minimal importance, and natural causes dominate climate variations and changes on all time scales.
Contributions from the following topics (but not exclusively) are invited: • Solar irradiance and energetic particle impacts on the atmosphere • Upper atmospheric dynamical variability and coupling between atmospheric layers • Solar variations and stratosphere - troposphere coupling • Solar
influence on climate variability • Solar irradiance (spectral and total irradiance) variations
Not exact matches
While natural sources of
climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human
influences have had an increasingly dominant effect
on the
climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century.
A study led by scientists at the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel shows that the ocean currents
influence the heat exchange between ocean and atmosphere and thus can explain
climate variability on decadal time scales.
However, as the atmospheric CO2 rises — due to the almost exponential increase in emissions from industrial sources — the
influence of solar
variability on the Earth's
climate will most likely decrease, and its relative contribution will be far surpassed by «greenhouse» gases.
Methods: While a few studies in the past investigated the
influence of
climate phenomena such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation and the Madden - Julian Oscillation
on the inter-annual
variability of tropical cyclones in the post-monsoon Bay of Bengal, changes in long - term cyclone activity are less well understood.
But in areas with complex landscapes like Montana, data points so widely spaced are inadequate to reflect
variability in terrain and vegetation and their
influence on climate.
Jiacan has worked
on several projects
on climate dynamics, including the response of large - scale circulations in the warming
climate, its effects
on regional weather patterns and extreme events, tropical
influence on mid-latitude weather, and dynamical mechanisms of sub-seasonal
variability of mid-latitude jet streams.
It is important to note that any potential effects will be spatially and temporally variable, depending
on current forest conditions, local site characteristics, environmental
influences, and annual and decadal patterns of
climate variability, such as the El Niño - Southern Oscillation cycle, which can drive regional weather and
climate conditions.
Understanding the
influence of solar
variability on the Earth's
climate requires knowledge of solar
variability, solar interactions, and the mechanisms explain the response of the Earth's
climate system.
Jo's scientific interests include radiative transfer in the atmosphere,
climate modelling, radiative forcing of
climate change and the
influence of solar irradiance
variability on climate.
Observed changes in ocean heat content have now been shown to be inconsistent with simulated natural
climate variability, but consistent with a combination of natural and anthropogenic
influences both
on a global scale, and in individual ocean basins.
It is, however, the
variability on large scales
influenced by interactions of the atmosphere with other components of the
climate system that is predictable.
It seems oddly tendentious to deny for instance the role of natural
variability on the basis that some of the recent changes in these long standing
climate patterns may be
influenced by greenhouse gases.
Brown, P. T., W. Li, and S. P. Xie (2015), Regions of significant
influence on unforced global mean surface air temperature
variability in
climate models, J. Geophys.
When will «the use of the latest information
on external
influences on the
climate system and adjusting for internal
variability associated with ENSO» make its way into the projection model?
US CLIVAR, a US
Climate Variability and Predictability Program, held a recent conference
on Arctic Change and Its
Influence on Mid-Latitude
Climate and Weather Agenda https://usclivar.org/meetings/2017-arctic-midlatitude-workshop-agenda with many interesting science perspectives
on this super interesting topic.
So: The study finds a fingerprint of anthropogenic
influences on large scale increase in precipitation extremes, with remaining uncertainties — namely that there is still a possibility that the widespread increase in heavy precipitation could be due to an unusual event of natural
variability.The intensification of extreme rainfall is expected with warming, and there is a clear physical mechanism for it, but it is never possible to completely separate a signal of external forcing from
climate variability — the separation will always be statistical in nature.
Natural
climate variability — including the periodic swings between El Nià ± o and La Nià ± a conditions in the Pacific — will sometimes overshadow global warming's
influence on hurricanes, Trenberth said.
A series of sensitivity tests show that our detection results are robust to observational data coverage change, interpolation methods,
influence of natural
climate variability on observations, and different model sampling (see Supplementary Information).
Has there really been a substantial neglect of solar
influences on climate and natural internal
variability?
«Solar
Variability Influences on Weather and
Climate: Possible Connections through Cosmic Ray Fluxes and Storm Intensification.»
This has resulted in a very substantial neglect of solar
influences on climate and natural internal
variability.
We suggest that North Atlantic millennial - scale
climate variability is associated with rearrangements of the atmospheric circulation with far - reaching
influences on the
climate.»
This change in long timescale
climate variability could have
influences on extreme events and seasonal
variability.
Internal
variability will continue to be a major
influence on climate, particularly in the near - term and at the regional scale.
Our ability to quantify the human
influence on global
climate is currently limited because the expected signal is still emerging from the noise of natural
variability, and because there are uncertainties in key factors.
Further analyses of long coupled model runs will be critical to resolve the
influence of the ocean thermohaline circulation and other natural
climate variations
on Arctic
climate and to determine whether natural
climate variability will make the Arctic more or less vulnerable to anthropogenic global warming.»
The intent of the working group is to spearhead a dedicated effort across the national and international
climate communities to advance progress
on identifying anthropogenic
influences on weather and
climate amidst the «noise» of internal
variability.
«
On forced temperature changes, internal variability, and the AMO» «Tracking the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation through the last 8,000 years» «The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic influence on climate» «The role of Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation in the global mean temperature variability» «The North Atlantic Oscillation as a driver of rapid climate change in the Northern Hemisphere» «The Atlanto - Pacific multidecade oscillation and its imprint on the global temperature record» «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» «North Atlantic Multidecadal SST Oscillation: External forcing versus internal variability» «Forced and internal twentieth - century SST trends in the North Atlantic» «Interactive comment on «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» by J. Mikšovský et al.» «Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures&raqu
On forced temperature changes, internal
variability, and the AMO» «Tracking the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation through the last 8,000 years» «The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic
influence on climate» «The role of Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation in the global mean temperature variability» «The North Atlantic Oscillation as a driver of rapid climate change in the Northern Hemisphere» «The Atlanto - Pacific multidecade oscillation and its imprint on the global temperature record» «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» «North Atlantic Multidecadal SST Oscillation: External forcing versus internal variability» «Forced and internal twentieth - century SST trends in the North Atlantic» «Interactive comment on «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» by J. Mikšovský et al.» «Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures&raqu
on climate» «The role of Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation in the global mean temperature
variability» «The North Atlantic Oscillation as a driver of rapid
climate change in the Northern Hemisphere» «The Atlanto - Pacific multidecade oscillation and its imprint
on the global temperature record» «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» «North Atlantic Multidecadal SST Oscillation: External forcing versus internal variability» «Forced and internal twentieth - century SST trends in the North Atlantic» «Interactive comment on «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» by J. Mikšovský et al.» «Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures&raqu
on the global temperature record» «Imprints of
climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» «North Atlantic Multidecadal SST Oscillation: External forcing versus internal
variability» «Forced and internal twentieth - century SST trends in the North Atlantic» «Interactive comment
on «Imprints of climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» by J. Mikšovský et al.» «Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures&raqu
on «Imprints of
climate forcings in global gridded temperature data» by J. Mikšovský et al.» «Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures»
The apparent conflict illustrates that understanding the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and other natural
variability, is critical for understanding the human
influence on climate Yet, they are largely ignored by the IPCC, and its followers including NOAA, and NASA.
We believe this is the first attempt to estimate the
influence of mechanical thinning
on runoff over multi-year broad - scale restoration projects that accounts for the effects of
climate variability.
There are much better arguments
on other items where (C) AGW is
on thin ice:
climate models which fail
on a lot of items like cloud cover, overestimate the
influence of aerosols, can't cope with natural
variability and therefore fail in their temperature forecasts.
This correlation could indicate that the AMO plays an important intermediary role in the
influence of the Pacific ENSO
on world
climate; alternatively, it might indicate that
variability in the thermohaline flow plays a bigger role than had previously been recognized.
This may be true (there is still plenty of debate
on that point) but since there are no good explanations of past natural
variability, that merely points out our ignorance of all the factors
influencing the
climate system.
The
influence of large - scale
climate modes of
variability (the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-RRB-
on APF magnitude is also assessed, and placed in context with these more localized controls.
Betts says:» the authors seem to assume that
climate science is entirely focussed
on anthropogenic
climate change, and that natural
variability is only researched as a supplementary issue in order to support the conclusions regarding anthropogenic
influence.»
Here is their description of the work: The
influence of solar
variability on Earth's
climate over centennial to millennial time scales is the subject of considerable debate.
In fact, they state that the data «clearly show» that «strong natural
variability has been characteristic of the Arctic at all time scales considered,» and they reiterate that the data suggest «that the human
influence on rate and size of
climate change thus far does not stand out strongly from other causes of
climate change.»»
While natural sources of
climate variability are significant, multiple lines of evidence indicate that human
influences have had an increasingly dominant effect
on global
climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century.
This approach provides a hybrid assessment of the combined
influence of anthropogenic
climate change [determined from the ensemble - mean of the CESM - LE or from the multi-model Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) archive (Taylor et al. 2012)-RSB- and observed NAO
variability on climate over the coming decades.
http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/h844264320314105/ «There are many interesting palaeoclimate studies that suggest that solar
variability had an
influence on pre-industrial
climate.
Based
on temperature records from 1864 to 2002, the odds of such a heatwave occurring are about 1 in 10 million.4 An event like the 2003 heatwave becomes much more likely after factoring in the observed warming of 2 °F over Europe and increased weather
variability.5 In addition, comparing computer models of
climate with and without human contribution shows that human
influence has roughly quadrupled the odds of a European summer as hot as or hotter than the summer of 2003.6
I agree gbaikie that models are not appropriate for prediction but could assist in sorting out natural
variability as distinct from anthropic
influences on weather and
climate.
«Understanding the internal ocean
variability and its
influence on climate is imperative for society.
Our results have important implications concerning the
influence of North Atlantic sea surface temperatures
on East Asian
climate, and provide support for the possibility of an AMO signature
on global multidecadal
climate variability.»
The strong
influence of natural
variability on surface air temperatures is the reason that
climate researchers regularly point out that any record shorter than around 20 - 30 years is not useful for detecting long - term trends associated with anthropogenic warming.
However, Solanki et al made the same point as we do: «This comparison shows without requiring any recourse to modeling that since roughly 1970 the solar
influence on climate (through the channels considered here) can not have been dominant» (Solanki et al., 2003), and: «Although the rarity of the current episode of high average sunspot numbers may indicate that the Sun has contributed to the unusual
climate change during the twentieth century, we point out that solar
variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades.»
Our results point to the need for future observational and modeling studies to focus
on the regional and seasonal characteristics of Antarctic
climate change, the regional response to ozone depletion, the
influence of tropical
variability and
climate change
on Antarctic
climate, and
on the mechanisms that link sea ice and air temperature in Antarctica.
Another external
influence on Earth's
climate is the
variability in the amount of energy the Sun emits.