«If an atheist who grew up without any type of
influence on religion» — I don't think this is possible in our country at least.
If an atheist who grew up without any type of
influence on religion, decided to leave the cult of non-belief and believe (insert any religion), would atheists respond with hate and shun them?
Sociologists can more tellingly object that plausibility structures may not go far enough toward specifying the importance of social conditions as
an influence on religion.
I think it's because they claim that «religion» (which is a pretty broad brush stroke) controls them through politics and established laws when, actually, religion is one of the few things these days that has
any influences on any religion.
A second advantage of adopting a world - order perspective is that we sometimes stand to gain insight into the deeper changes underlying what seem to be more proximate
influences on religion.
Not exact matches
Alternatively, many sociologists predicted that, with the increasing emphasis
on individualism and the therapeutic in American culture,
religion would have an increasingly marginal
influence on domestic life, and the traditional family as the 1950s knew it would gradually disappear in the face of «family modernization,» as some theorists called it.
«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not
on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to
influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our
religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions
on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its
influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them
on others, hath established and maintained false
religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
Toby applies the prayer to the hopeful decline and eventual elimination of
religion because of its obvious harmfulness to society: we can't change the harm
religion has done in the past, so we must serenely move
on; we must courageously overcome the dangerous
influence of
religion in our society; and we must know the difference between harm done and the harm that can be prevented from
religion.
It is evident that this period
influenced Morrison's permanent interest in exploring the relationships between
religion and its surrounding culture, with the result that a unique feature of the Century came to be its openness to articles
on topics — political and literary, for instance — that did not commonly appear in religious publications.
In Part 1 and Part 2 of this 3 - Part series
on how Satan casts out Satan, we learned that Satan uses violent
religion to attack and kill the messengers of God, and thus, appear to be «casting out Satan» while in reality, he is only solidifying his own power and
influence in the world.
Without a doubt there are brands of
religion, including Christianity, which does desire to exert
influence on the whole public.
However, if we blame our bad conduct, or place credit for our good conduct,
on the
influence of
religion, we are not only slightly deluded, but we are moral cowards, too.
While three out of four Americans (72 %, a record high) believe that
religion is «losing its
influence on American life,» a majority of Americans (56 percent) also believe this shift has been for the worse.
Exploring the
influence of televangelism
on American
religion in his book The Struggle for America's Soul, Princeton sociologist Robert Wuthnow presents a typical, though hypothetical, case study: Mabel Miller.
To say that
on the whole
religion has been important in human history is not to say that its
influence has been wholly good.
-- to correct believer bullsh!t — to argue against
religion driven laws and
influence — to keep an eye
on the crazies that want to put the USA and Canada
on the road to becoming a theocracy — to
influence undecideds away from joining any religious cult (and all religios are cults)-- for the humor of the nuttiness of things believers believe, say and do
Look around and notice all the
religions (or spirituality or beliefs, etc) that have been formed by virtually every tribe
on the planet (some completely independently, others having been
influenced by their neighbors).
Berger has subsequently and substantively changed his thinking about
religion and secularization, but the theory set forth in that book continues to have enormous
influence on the discussion of these questions.
Author John Charles Cooper, dean of academic affairs at Winebrenner Theological Seminary, sums up the situation: «People do feel that
religion is losing its
influence on society, and they may be right — but the majority of people do not wish this to be true, and so it is an important time to be publishing good religious books.
1) seperation of church and state; state funded public schools can't teach anything that is directly
influenced by
religion other than just touching
on that kind of topic.
A lot of studies have been done
on how
religion, especially the protestant kind, has
influenced the economic development of the west.
66 % of people polled believe that
religion is losing its
influence on life in America.
It goes
on to suggest that a high proportion of Jews are «secularists» who hate all
religions and who «want to denude the «public square» of every last trace of religious
influence.»
Atheists crack me up when they speak of morality as though they figured it all out
on their own with absolutely no
influence from
religion.
Anglican and Nonconformist theologians, philosophers, and writers (Thomas Carlyle, John Ruskin, Frederic Dennis Maurice, Charles Kingsley), especially the Christian Socialists, were interested in the normative aspect of the problems of
religion and society.15 In the younger generation several of these trends are blended: William Temple, John MacMurray, Maurice B. Rickett, Vigo A. Demant.16 Max Weber's
influence in England never reached as deep as in France or the United States; it remained limited to his theories
on economics.
Inasmuch as it is an interaction which is examined, justice must be done to the
influence both of society
on religion, and of
religion on society.
A few paragraphs later Cardinal Dulles laments that «the greatest threat to
religion, in my estimation, is the kind of secularism that would exclude
religion from the public forum and that treats churches as purely private institutions that have no rightful
influence on legislation, public policy, and other dimensions of public life.»
As and atheist, I am concerned with the
influence religion has
on the general public, specifically when it comes to women's rights, civil rights, gay rights, and the like.
«Relatively few people participate in the Iowa caucuses, so it's ideal for a group of highly committed activists to have a big
influence,» says John Green, an expert
on religion and politics at the University of Akron.
First, I am a professor of philosophy and a professional philosopher, I guess you could say, privy to the philosophical movements of the twentieth century, many of which, for better or worse, have had an
influence on theology and thinking about
religion.
On the eve of what will most certainly be a «new,» multiracial South Africa,
religion remains a pervasive and powerful social
influence.
If Santa Clausism became the dominant «
religion» of the country, tried to
influence the government, inst / itute laws and public policies and demand that it be taught in public education - start every school day with a reading from «Twas the Night Before Christmas» and have «Ho Ho Ho»
on your money - I'm just betting that you would have something to say about it
on an internet forum and elsewhere!
So it is that «growing numbers of people are abandoning
religion in practice;
on every side they
influence literature, the arts, the interpretation of the humanities and of history and civil laws themselves.
Specific notions of deity, and of divine action, that have figured in theistic conceptual systems of long - past civilizations have certainly been
influenced by then - prevailing technology — the ways in which people made their living.5 In our own time, recent developments in technology and in science have had major
influence on how the object of
religion is conceived, at least for some theists.6 Whitehead wrote:
I know a lot of people in my
religion think Jesus would naturally be one of «us», though they can't seem to stomach what He did
on the daily basis, which was go where the need was and be the
influence of good.
[Rachel Zoll, 2001:8 A] This example indicates the
influence that the sheer number of adherents of a particular
religion have
on the socio - political affairs of modern states, and in a world where truth seems to get blurred amidst statistics.
Bultmann,
on the other hand, tries to avoid this threat to the kerygma, not by denying the
influence of its environment, nor by a naïve dogmatism which the study of the History of
Religions has rendered obsolete, but by penetrating through the temporary framework of mythology to the permanent truth behind it.
Religious
influence throughout history is usually a violent one where civilizations turn
on each other over who has the right
religion.
But
religion, unfounded self - reinforcing systems of belief that can have powerful, often negative
influences over virtually all parts of our lives, shouldn't have a place any more than mal - ware has a place
on our computers.
While both parties may be
influenced by
religion, one party moreso than another relies more heavily
on that; because of that reliance that party essentially CA N'T do anything positive for gay people because it would go against their religious beliefs.
The term usually signifies the process by which
religion loses social significance, but the emphasis may be
on the relationship of Church and State or
on the social
influence of
religion, or used to speak about individual belief and practice.9
And a recent Gallup Poll reports that of a representative cross-section of adult Americans, 69 per cent felt that
religion was increasing its
influence on American life in 1957, but that only 14 per cent felt the same way in 1969.
On every question about economic or political decisions, from general influence on public policy to specific influence on the minimum wage, between 75 percent and 85 percent of African - Americans said that religion should be involve
On every question about economic or political decisions, from general
influence on public policy to specific influence on the minimum wage, between 75 percent and 85 percent of African - Americans said that religion should be involve
on public policy to specific
influence on the minimum wage, between 75 percent and 85 percent of African - Americans said that religion should be involve
on the minimum wage, between 75 percent and 85 percent of African - Americans said that
religion should be involved.
The great political philosophers from Aristotle to Machiavelli to Montesquieu (who had such an
influence on the founders of the republic) all believed a political regime is an expression of the total way of life of a people, its economics, its customs, its
religion.
On the other hand, as far as lies in your power, you are to protect and support the free exercise of
religion of the country, and the undisturbed enjoyment of the rights of conscience in religious matters, with your utmost
influence and authority.
Stephen Prothero is a nut case who wants to force all
religions to be taught at public schools:: «Prothero has argued for mandatory public school Bible literacy courses (along the lines of the Bible Literacy Project's The Bible and Its
Influence), along with mandatory courses
on world
religions.»
To be sure, each of these subjective features is more prominent in
religion; there is a greater diversity of models, greater
influence of interpretation
on data, greater tenacity in commitment to paradigms, and greater ambiguity in paradigm choice.
But in the twentieth century, the main
influences of science
on religion have come less from specific theories — such as quantum physics, relativity, astronomy, or molecular biology — than from views of science as a method.
I spoke of the earlier generation,
influenced by the grand gestures of modernism and sensitive to the aggressive early twentieth - century secularist attacks
on religion, as writers inclined to «shout.»
Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not
on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds, that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his Supreme will that free it shall remain, by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint: That all attempts to
influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our
religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions
on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its
influence on reason alone.