Sentences with phrase «influence over climate science»

We are in a position to influence these new onlookers, and their audiences, much more so than we might have had any influence over climate science.

Not exact matches

Over the past few years, several US states and local school boards have introduced measures that would mean teachers must include the views of those who are sceptical of a human influence on climate change in science lessons.

* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)

One of the toughest realities attending debates over what to do, or not do, about the growing human influence on the climate system is that more science does not necessarily clarify society's, or individual's, responses.

The first group of authors tries to label the climate science community as an army of influential catastrophists, alarmists, and profiteers — glossing over the reality that the vast body of climate science and climate policy analysis is, as in any field, full of gradations (not to mention that there's not much evidence of substantial influence).

It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence» in the fight over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage in money and influence held by industries dealing in, or dependent on, fossil fuels.

Not because climate scientists — over 97 percent of whom believe that human activities influence the climate — have found new data rebutting the science, but because polls show climate change dropping off the list of voters» priorities.

When outlets such as The New York Times finally weighed in, their stories tended to confuse climate politics (the debate over what to do about GW) and climate science (that debate over what we know about the Earth and our influence upon it).

A person can believe climate science, and do everything in their power to eliminate the portion of greenhouse gas emissions over which they have some influence.

This would get beyond the settled science part of radiative heat transfer physics that most of us (including Judy) accepts and puts more emphasis into the context of «to what extent» will it influence our climate over what period of time.

A combination of fanatical green activists and wealthy crony - capitalists has produced a strong influence over the Obama administration and its climate policies / regulations... Democrats in Congress have also been bought off... unfortunately for the American public, these corrupting motivations lead the government and bureaucrats down policy paths that ignore climate history and its science...

``... And I'm going to show you the latest science, which now doesn't leave the question unsettled anymore this is now settled science, it is now settled science that there is not a problem with our influence over Climate.