Sentences with phrase «influence over science»

When asked whether there should be full disclosure on industry influence over science, he said, «Yes, I believe in full disclosure.»

The creation of UK Research and Innovation, intended to increase the power of UK research funding bodies, means Walport will continue to wield great influence over science in government.

It's well past time to end the corporate influence over science and our health — you can send a message to Congress today that we need real chemical safety reform, not more rules backed by phony chemical industry studies.

Not exact matches

But while beating people up over unconscious bias is pointless (especially as science shows basically everybody has hidden biases), we all do have a responsibility to take action to make sure bias doesn't influence hiring.

As for Rasputin's apparent ability to stop Alexei's bleeding, Smith explains at length how modern science accepts the influence of mind over body.

Over the past decade, the Regent University College of Science & Technology has shaped minds and influenced the Ghanaian society.

Citizens» control over spending is not direct, of course, but in most Western countries public attitudes influence how well or how poorly appropriators fund science.

Over the past few years, several US states and local school boards have introduced measures that would mean teachers must include the views of those who are sceptical of a human influence on climate change in science lessons.

Attracting Talent: Location Choices of Foreign - Born PhDs in the US, by economists Jeffrey Grogger of the University of Chicago and Gordon H. Hanson of the University of California, San Diego, looks back over 5 decades of data from the National Science Foundation's Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) to identify the factors that influence how newly graduated scientists decide where to live and work.

Dead Sea, Jordan 7th November, 2017 Over 2,500 Science Leaders from over 120 Countries Gather at the World Science Forum 2017 Jordan Calling for a More Responsible and Ethical Use of Innovation to Address the Social & Economic Relevance, Influence & Responsibilities of Science Arab Region To Explore Establishing A Regular Open Science FoOver 2,500 Science Leaders from over 120 Countries Gather at the World Science Forum 2017 Jordan Calling for a More Responsible and Ethical Use of Innovation to Address the Social & Economic Relevance, Influence & Responsibilities of Science Arab Region To Explore Establishing A Regular Open Science Foover 120 Countries Gather at the World Science Forum 2017 Jordan Calling for a More Responsible and Ethical Use of Innovation to Address the Social & Economic Relevance, Influence & Responsibilities of Science Arab Region To Explore Establishing A Regular Open Science Forum.

All that time hanging out with Nolan has obviously rubbed off: Franklin's directorial debut, The Escape, is a handsomely filmed science - fiction short that wears its influences on its sleeve: it feels like something that Nolan might make over a few days while waiting for Hans Zimmer to finish scoring his latest blockbuster.

But in schools where teachers acting collectively as a union had a lot of influence over the curriculum, students performed 32 points worse in math, 18 points in science.

Since its inception, SFWA ® has grown in numbers and influence until it is now widely recognized as one of the most effective non-profit writers» organizations in exstence, boasting a membership of over 1,700 science fiction and fantasy writers as well as artists, editors and allied professionals.

In addition to her professorship in the Maddie's ® Shelter Medicine Program at UF and her influence on students all over the U.S. and globally, Dr. Levy has been a leader in advancing the science and well - being of community cats.

Aubrey Williams» paintings have always resisted classification, evolving through many distinct phases over the course of his career — he drew influence from Olmec, Maya, Warrau imagery, science fiction, the symphonies and quartets of Russian composer Dimitri Shostakovich, and artists such as Jackson Pollock, Arshile Gorky, Diego Rivera, Yves Klein and Rufino Tamayo.

* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)

One of the toughest realities attending debates over what to do, or not do, about the growing human influence on the climate system is that more science does not necessarily clarify society's, or individual's, responses.

The first group of authors tries to label the climate science community as an army of influential catastrophists, alarmists, and profiteers — glossing over the reality that the vast body of climate science and climate policy analysis is, as in any field, full of gradations (not to mention that there's not much evidence of substantial influence).

It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence» in the fight over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage in money and influence held by industries dealing in, or dependent on, fossil fuels.

Not because climate scientists — over 97 percent of whom believe that human activities influence the climate — have found new data rebutting the science, but because polls show climate change dropping off the list of voters» priorities.

Since people's beliefs about evolution are influenced by their perceptions of scientific consensus, the total role of science knowledge in shaping a person's opinion likely operates indirectly through beliefs about scientific consensus as well as directly through beliefs about whether humans have evolved over time.

When outlets such as The New York Times finally weighed in, their stories tended to confuse climate politics (the debate over what to do about GW) and climate science (that debate over what we know about the Earth and our influence upon it).

These scientists have used the IPCC to jump the normal meritocracy process by which scientists achieve influence over the politics of science and policy.

Your original post was about «a cadre of scientists whose careers have been made by the IPCC [and] used the IPCC to jump the normal meritocracy process by which scientists achieve influence over the politics of science and policy.»

A person can believe climate science, and do everything in their power to eliminate the portion of greenhouse gas emissions over which they have some influence.

This would get beyond the settled science part of radiative heat transfer physics that most of us (including Judy) accepts and puts more emphasis into the context of «to what extent» will it influence our climate over what period of time.

A combination of fanatical green activists and wealthy crony - capitalists has produced a strong influence over the Obama administration and its climate policies / regulations... Democrats in Congress have also been bought off... unfortunately for the American public, these corrupting motivations lead the government and bureaucrats down policy paths that ignore climate history and its science...

We don't think the science is that clear cut — most of that dealing with decadal prediction suggesting a cooling influence from natural variation over a decade or three.

The first is cohort shift: based on their experience and common exposure to social influences, the Millennials, while far from uniform in their assessments of controversial science - issues, are less worked up over them.

``... And I'm going to show you the latest science, which now doesn't leave the question unsettled anymore this is now settled science, it is now settled science that there is not a problem with our influence over Climate.

Individual scientists, institutional officials, and scholars in the social studies of science over the past decade have suggested that various factors lead to or encourage misconduct in science, but the influence of any individual factor or combination of suggested factors has not been examined systematically.

We are in a position to influence these new onlookers, and their audiences, much more so than we might have had any influence over climate science.