Sentences with phrase «influenced by christian»

They were Catholic mothers, influenced by the Christian Family Movement, who spoke of breast - feeding as «God's plan for mothers and babies.»
The dying person may be influenced by the Christian myth of hell — So they buy their way out, a young lover — who finds them hot at the age of 90, or a cat — That will be taken to the pound upon the person's death.
Or were American art, literature, newspapers, television, and radio in any way influenced by Christian insights concerning life?
This one seems to me, for people who profess and call themselves Christians and who are to some degree influenced by Christian ideas and symbols, the most striking and terrible.
The Church pursued her mission in a developed world that was still broadly influenced by a Christian moral vision and vocabulary.
But while the possibility of such contact is admitted, there is no justification for the exaggerated view put forward by such scholars as De Boer, Von Kremer, and D. B. Macdonald that the development of Muslim theology was largely influenced by Christian thought.
Although the selection and organization of the material throughout reflects the special interest in illuminating Christian existence and is undoubtedly influenced by its Christian perspective, the attempt in Chapters Three through Ten is to describe each structure of existence as objectively as possible.
Voobus suggests the possibility that the same ascetic groups on the periphery of Palestinian Judaism also in turn were influenced by the Christian message and they contributed to the formation of a distinct group in the Palestinian Aramean Christianity.
The characteristic intellectual, at least in English - speaking countries, is much influenced by the Christian ethic.
Anders never did this in the name of God or Jesus or wasn't influenced by Christian Theology or Church for him to carry out these actions.
For example, Gandhi, who despite being influenced by Christian teaching remained a Hindu, said, «I can not ascribe exclusive divinity to Jesus.
That just tells me that Kings work is derivative and possibly influenced by his christian worldview.

Not exact matches

No - one can dispute that the Founding Fathers were influenced in their ideas by the Bible — but «influenced by» doesn't mean they intended to create a Christian Nation.
Do the conservative Protestants who were influenced by religion choose to earn less by becoming pastors or teachers at Christian schools or by taking jobs that allow them to spend more time with their family?
If the same Bible can provide a reason for different sects of Christianity where one group can tell another group that they are not «truly Christian,» then there must be some other evidence besides the Bible that proves sect right eo usness since the same Bible is being interpreted (i.e. influenced by some other non-Biblical source) differently.
He first notes that the Christian concept of God as Father has been under attack» much of the attack coming from Catholics influenced by feminist psychology.
It is fair to say that a great deal of Christian preaching, and not only at Christmas, has been powerfully influenced by Brown's earlier (1977) The Birth of the Messiah, and it is possible this new work will make no less an impact.
the woman that say that the persecution of the christian was just a myth and a fabricated, is influence by the spirit of the ROMANS to say something like that.
It's not interesting because it was almost certainly a joke to annoy some fundamentalist Christian pro-lifer who had been falsely accusing these people of being influenced by Satan.
The figures may be influenced by the fact Christians on average older than the rest of the country.
Some early Christians were influenced by ascetic and sometimes apocalyptic tendencies; interestingly, they joined pacifism and sexual abstinence to their radical criticism of wealth, possessions and consumption.
Augustine of Hippo, arguably the most influential theologian to ever live and the theologian that a majority of modern Christian theology has been influenced by, did not hold to literal six - day creationism.
And then I went to a tiny Christian college and that's where I lost my faith, surrounded by Christians, with no influence of pop culture and not so much as one atheist in my circle of acquaintances.
Many atheists have very similar morals to Christians — particularly if they live in a country influenced by the Judaeo - Christian faith.
The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz
Furthermore, Christians can still be oppressed and influenced by demons.
Many of those by whom I have been most influenced are not Christian.
He was well acquainted with Christian theology, having been particularly influenced as a young man by the thought of Reinhold Niebuhr.
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
Many of our churches are excessively influenced, and some even dominated, by radical ideologies whose agendas contradict the Scriptures and historic teachings that are the foundation of Christian faith.
The main liberation movement, the ANC, long committed to nonviolent resistance under the influence of Gandhi and its Christian roots, had by 1963 decided, after agonizing debate, to engage in an armed struggle.
Even the Christian fathers from Goa, represented by Aquaviva and Monserrate, came to join this debate, but they failed to influence Akbar.
In the years when fresh invasions were sweeping new waves of pagans in destructive raids into nominally Christian areas and Arabs were bringing about half of what had been Christendom under the sway of the Crescent, Christianity was recouping some of its losses by conversions in that very Mediterranean Basin and on the borders of what had been the Roman Empire among peoples which until then had been largely on entirely outside its influence.
While monasticism in modern times has been deeply influenced by Dom Paul Delatte's rather rigorous interpretation of the Holy Rule (he was Abbot of Solesmes from 1890 to 1921) we find in Hugh Gilbert's firm but gentle hands a rather more humane understanding of the contemporary mind, particularly in his substantial treatment of the concept of obedience (a minefield for any Christian apologist) which stands at the centre of this present work.
Self - schooled in the history of European nationalism — especially as championed by Giuseppe Mazzini in Italy — Savarkar sought to give expression to a broad cultural ideology that could challenge the British Raj, counter Western influence more generally, and provide intellectual defenses against Muslim beliefs and the allegedly culture - destroying work of Christian missionaries.
You'd be hard pressed to find a single bit of modern scientific knowledge that wasn't discovered, or heavily influenced by, the work of devout Christians.
I'm convinced that the growth in the early Church was significantly influenced by how the early Christians dealt with adversity and with the circumstances around them.
As long as Christians seek to present a strong and vital testimony of their faith, they must know that the world of which they are a part is influenced by an atheistic climate.
It seems to me that this might provide a sort of death - and - resurrection moment for Christians — a death to the old ways of measuring impact by money, power, numbers, and influence and a resurrection into the ways of Jesus, where the focus is on the hard work of discipleship, healing, fellowship, etc..
We work hard to insure oppression, poverty and lack of opportunity to progress is not granted by the voice we have been given, as Christians, to influence our entire society to do what Jesus did.
So widespread is the influence of the Christian faith in the culture that has nurtured us, that nothing we do or say is left uninfluenced by it.
It must be remembered that the early Christian community moved almost wholly into the Gentile world within a generation or two after its origin within Judaism, and that, as Christian thought took more definite shape within the next three or four centuries, it was inevitable that it should have been strongly influenced by the prevailing philosophy of the Hellenistic culture in which the church moved.
Not the haburah fellowship meal celebrated by a group of Pharisees; no such meal existed (J. Jeremias, Eucharistic Words of Jesus [1965], pp. 30 f.) Not the Qumran communal meal anticipating the «messianic banquet», for all that this may have influenced the Christian practice, because that is simply a special meaning given to the regular communal meal at Qumran, whereas our evidence indicates that the Christian practice was something out of the ordinary which the early Christians did and which helped to give them a special identity.
The linkage of man with an animal heritage on grounds of variation dictated simply by his response to environmental changes introduced a dominance of physical influences which could in no way be squared with the Christian doctrine of man.
Nevertheless, influenced by more atomistic modes of thinking inherited from the Greeks, many Christians came to think of the self as a soul isolated from the body and cut off from the world by the boundaries of the skin, an immortal substance in a perishable body.
Indeed, the modern religious right was birthed by the idea that Christians needed to get out of their churches and exercise political power and influence.
But ours has been a Christian history, and it is by renewal of Christian influence that we are most likely to restore these humanizing qualities to our society.
Yet these 2 issues have become the major ones by which the Christian right chooses which political party it will throw it's considerable influence & finances behind.
If a person claims to be christian I have no choice but to believe them, as there is no way to measure or even prove any influence by a supernatural being.
According to this interpretation, our form of government enjoys lasting legitimacy because it was created by Founding Fathers who were deeply influenced by Judeo - Christian values.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z