Not exact matches
There is one and only one justification for a carbon tax — an attempt to
influence the future course of the earth's climate (or, as some people prefer, to mitigate
anthropogenic climate change)
by trying to force down the
emissions of the most abundant human - generated greenhouse gas.
As LST closely tracks air temperatures over the instrumental period, we can also infer that air temperatures in this region of East Africa varied in concert with the global average and thus were controlled primarily
by the major forcings
influencing temperatures over this timescale, both natural (solar radiation, volcanism) and
anthropogenic (greenhouse - gas
emissions; refs 19, 20).
In addition to that the lacking warming during the recent 15 years can not be explained
by any change of CO2 content in the atmosphere, there are evidences available according to which the changes of CO2 contents in the atmosphere are dominated
by natural causes, where
influence of
anthropogenic CO2
emissions is so minimal that it can not be found
by measurements in reality.
To slow the rate of
anthropogenic - induced climate change in the 21st century and to minimize its eventual magnitude, societies will need to manage the climate forcing factors that are directly
influenced by human activities, in particular greenhouse gas and aerosol
emissions.
Instead, carbon removal aims to reduce historical human
influence on the climate system
by decreasing the amount of excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere — essentially reversing the
influence of
anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions.
In this regard, carbon removal approaches share a common purpose with conventional climate mitigation technologies, which also seek to reduce human
influence on the climate system (
by reducing future
anthropogenic GHG
emissions).