Sentences with phrase «influencing model outcome»

The most significant factors influencing model outcome were virus prevalence in the reservoir population (s) and its effective contact rate with tigers.

Not exact matches

A variety of studies suggest that fathers» engagement positively impacts their children's social competence, 27 children's later IQ28 and other learning outcomes.29 The effects of fathers on children can include later - life educational, social and family outcomes.1, 2,26 Children may develop working models of appropriate paternal behaviour based on early childhood cues such as father presence, 30,31 in turn shaping their own later partnering and parenting dynamics, such as more risky adolescent sexual behaviour32 and earlier marriage.33 Paternal engagement decreases boys» negative social behaviour (e.g., delinquency) and girls» psychological problems in early adulthood.34 Fathers» financial support, apart from engagement, can also influence children's cognitive development.35
This makes pediatric appendectomy a perfect model to study how cost might influence patient behavior; for while the outcomes are similar, laparoscopy is considerably more expensive than the open operation.
Modelling flood risk in Europe — global warming the biggest influence In the framework of the HELIX FP7 Project, scientists analysed the differences in projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomes.
Meanwhile, self - conception and long - run spending habits also influenced outcomes considerably, adding a wrinkle to existing models of household behavior in these circumstances.
His lab develops isogenic human pluripotent stem cells and transgenic animals to model disease, with the goal of delineating novel approaches to influence outcomes for Huntington disease (HD) and Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), the most common genetic causes of dementia and intellectual disability, respectively.
Hence we are initiating a new paradigm for patient stratification based on modelling multi-level patient phenotypes, which could beneficially influence patient outcomes by improving optimisation of therapeutic strategies.
To make the most of their power to steer their brains toward positive learning outcomes, it may be helpful to introduce students to what we call the CIA model, which stands for control, influence, and acknowledge.
Stage theory conceptualizes leadership succession as a process with distinct phases and demands, rather than a singular event.212 Patterns in the process have been identified, and the ways in which each phase of the succession process shapes and influences the outcome of subsequent phases have been described.213 Most stage models predict that it takes at least five to seven years to build relationships of trust that can serve as a foundation for movement to later stages of the succession process — «consolidation and refinement,» in Gabarro «s (1987) terms.
This organization works closely with ALEC and the Koch Bros. / Americans for Prosperity to promote passage of model legislation and influence political outcomes, so it was natural that after ALEC came under fire for its secretive nature, participants sought shelter within the SPN.
A Value - Added Model (VAM) is a multivariate (multiple variable) student growth model that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external influences on outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over tModel (VAM) is a multivariate (multiple variable) student growth model that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external influences on outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over tmodel that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external influences on outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over time).
Pounder et al. test a model of the influence of principals, teachers, parents, and secretaries on a number of mediating variables, as well as a range of school outcomes, providing a useful model for our approach a decade later.
Whilst there are some disparities between the two — Wool hasn't had a print run prior to its acquisition by a major publisher, for instance, while Fifty Shades of Grey was available as print on demand before Vintage bought the rights to it — a vaguely comparable publishing model is probably the least distressing outcome to any sentence that begins «Fifty Shades of Grey - influenced», so it might be best not to question it too much.
For the measures with wider deviations, many factors contribute to differences between the AEO Reference case projections and realized outcomes, but two primary contributors are the initial projections of future oil prices and overall economic activity that are used in NEMS.5 These projections can greatly influence the other projections made by the model, which is why each recent AEO includes alternative cases exploring differences in economic growth (Low and High Economic Growth cases) and in oil prices (Low and High Oil Price cases).
The two different types of potential effects on early programming of pro-inflammatory responses (Gluckman et al., 2005; Rickard and Lummaa, 2007) suggest the need to examine two indirect pathways in models examining potential biological mechanisms of influence from parenting to later health outcomes.
Advances in prevention in public health2 provide a model for prevention of adolescent health - risk behaviors by focusing on risk and protective factors predictive of these behaviors.3, 4 Research on the predictors of school failure, delinquency, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, and violence indicates that many of the same factors predict these different outcomes.5, 6 Recent research has shown that bonding to school and family protects against a broad range of health - risk behaviors in adoles cence.6 Yet, prevention studies typically have focused narrowly on a specific outcome, such as preventing substance abuse, and on attitudes and social influences that predict that outcome.7, 8 Previous studies on prevention have not sought to address the shared risk and protective factors for diverse health - risk behaviors that are the main threats to adolescent health.
Understanding how ACEs influence health - risk behaviors and health outcomes is perhaps easiest done by reviewing the ACE Pyramid Model (see Figure 1).
Other studies have shown that the number of psychiatric disorders a person has is related to life outcomes in young adulthood, 5 and that co-occurring mental disorders, to a small extent, influenced the consequences of anxiety and depression.3, 4, 23 More general personal traits such as childhood temperament and intellectual abilities are other individual factors that may be of importance, 26, 29 but the effects of intellectual function and psychiatric disease seem independent of each other.25 Our results indicated an influence of family factors, as indicated by the attenuation of OR in model 3.
Sociodemographic characteristics were included as controls in the models on the basis of numerous studies that document associations between these markers and behavioral outcomes.15 Multiple indicators of positive (eg, closeness, safety) and negative (eg, aggression, negative influence) dimensions of family, school, and community contexts were included on the basis of previous research.1, 7,11 — 15
Major drivers to out - of - home care or poorer outcomes subsequent to care include lack of role models, increased rates of autism amongst children, inter-generational trauma, placement in non-indigenous contexts and lack of understanding of cultural connections and community input, the influence of substance abuse and incarceration, and, critically, male domestic violence.
Many of the covariates in typical regression models represent potential causal pathways by which the neighborhood may influence the outcome.
In order to understand the influence of early care and education on children's outcomes, an ecological model needs to be applied that will consider key aspects of the family environment that have also been found to influence children's competencies.
Second, we will enter explanatory variables into the models to determine which factors have the most influence on outcomes and inequalities in these outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children.
The theoretical model is based on a dynamic developmental systems approach to problematic family functioning, which points to the importance of developmental systems, including family risk context and key influential social interactional systems, and emphasizes influence that is directly pertinent to the outcome of interest.
A variety of studies suggest that fathers» engagement positively impacts their children's social competence, 27 children's later IQ28 and other learning outcomes.29 The effects of fathers on children can include later - life educational, social and family outcomes.1, 2,26 Children may develop working models of appropriate paternal behaviour based on early childhood cues such as father presence, 30,31 in turn shaping their own later partnering and parenting dynamics, such as more risky adolescent sexual behaviour32 and earlier marriage.33 Paternal engagement decreases boys» negative social behaviour (e.g., delinquency) and girls» psychological problems in early adulthood.34 Fathers» financial support, apart from engagement, can also influence children's cognitive development.35
Hilliard and colleagues (2012) outlined a diabetes resilience theoretical model based on much of this body of literature, but they suggest that most of resilience intervention research conducted thus far has focused on minimizing the influence of risk factors (i.e., supporting protective factors) for poor diabetes outcomes.
Once the outcome models were derived, inverse probability weighting (IPW)[47] was used as a sampling weight to investigate the possible influence of selective participation on our estimates of association between parental alcohol and offspring conduct problems and depressive symptoms, respectively.
However, this research along with investigations of the Double ABCX model has failed to examine the influence of family appraisals on parental outcomes and measures of adaptation.
Social organization and contextual model of family stress theories are employed as frameworks for the analyses of how dimensions of military culture influence parents» life satisfaction, as well as key developmental outcomes of their adolescents (for example, mental health).
Person - environment fit models have been extensively used to document the way in which the fit between personality characteristics and various contextual variables at work influence work related behaviors and outcomes [17] and offers a valuable starting point for understanding the fit between personality traits and teamwork requirements.
Furthermore, multilevel modeling enables the influence of person - specific factors on outcome variables to be statistically controlled (DeLucia & Pitts, 2006).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z