The most significant factors
influencing model outcome were virus prevalence in the reservoir population (s) and its effective contact rate with tigers.
Not exact matches
A variety of studies suggest that fathers» engagement positively impacts their children's social competence, 27 children's later IQ28 and other learning
outcomes.29 The effects of fathers on children can include later - life educational, social and family
outcomes.1, 2,26 Children may develop working
models of appropriate paternal behaviour based on early childhood cues such as father presence, 30,31 in turn shaping their own later partnering and parenting dynamics, such as more risky adolescent sexual behaviour32 and earlier marriage.33 Paternal engagement decreases boys» negative social behaviour (e.g., delinquency) and girls» psychological problems in early adulthood.34 Fathers» financial support, apart from engagement, can also
influence children's cognitive development.35
This makes pediatric appendectomy a perfect
model to study how cost might
influence patient behavior; for while the
outcomes are similar, laparoscopy is considerably more expensive than the open operation.
Modelling flood risk in Europe — global warming the biggest
influence In the framework of the HELIX FP7 Project, scientists analysed the differences in projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed
outcomes.
Meanwhile, self - conception and long - run spending habits also
influenced outcomes considerably, adding a wrinkle to existing
models of household behavior in these circumstances.
His lab develops isogenic human pluripotent stem cells and transgenic animals to
model disease, with the goal of delineating novel approaches to
influence outcomes for Huntington disease (HD) and Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), the most common genetic causes of dementia and intellectual disability, respectively.
Hence we are initiating a new paradigm for patient stratification based on
modelling multi-level patient phenotypes, which could beneficially
influence patient
outcomes by improving optimisation of therapeutic strategies.
To make the most of their power to steer their brains toward positive learning
outcomes, it may be helpful to introduce students to what we call the CIA
model, which stands for control,
influence, and acknowledge.
Stage theory conceptualizes leadership succession as a process with distinct phases and demands, rather than a singular event.212 Patterns in the process have been identified, and the ways in which each phase of the succession process shapes and
influences the
outcome of subsequent phases have been described.213 Most stage
models predict that it takes at least five to seven years to build relationships of trust that can serve as a foundation for movement to later stages of the succession process — «consolidation and refinement,» in Gabarro «s (1987) terms.
This organization works closely with ALEC and the Koch Bros. / Americans for Prosperity to promote passage of
model legislation and
influence political
outcomes, so it was natural that after ALEC came under fire for its secretive nature, participants sought shelter within the SPN.
A Value - Added
Model (VAM) is a multivariate (multiple variable) student growth model that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external influences on outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over t
Model (VAM) is a multivariate (multiple variable) student growth
model that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external influences on outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over t
model that attempts to account or statistically control for all potential student, teacher, school, district, and external
influences on
outcome measures (i.e., growth in student achievement over time).
Pounder et al. test a
model of the
influence of principals, teachers, parents, and secretaries on a number of mediating variables, as well as a range of school
outcomes, providing a useful
model for our approach a decade later.
Whilst there are some disparities between the two — Wool hasn't had a print run prior to its acquisition by a major publisher, for instance, while Fifty Shades of Grey was available as print on demand before Vintage bought the rights to it — a vaguely comparable publishing
model is probably the least distressing
outcome to any sentence that begins «Fifty Shades of Grey -
influenced», so it might be best not to question it too much.
For the measures with wider deviations, many factors contribute to differences between the AEO Reference case projections and realized
outcomes, but two primary contributors are the initial projections of future oil prices and overall economic activity that are used in NEMS.5 These projections can greatly
influence the other projections made by the
model, which is why each recent AEO includes alternative cases exploring differences in economic growth (Low and High Economic Growth cases) and in oil prices (Low and High Oil Price cases).
The two different types of potential effects on early programming of pro-inflammatory responses (Gluckman et al., 2005; Rickard and Lummaa, 2007) suggest the need to examine two indirect pathways in
models examining potential biological mechanisms of
influence from parenting to later health
outcomes.
Advances in prevention in public health2 provide a
model for prevention of adolescent health - risk behaviors by focusing on risk and protective factors predictive of these behaviors.3, 4 Research on the predictors of school failure, delinquency, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, and violence indicates that many of the same factors predict these different
outcomes.5, 6 Recent research has shown that bonding to school and family protects against a broad range of health - risk behaviors in adoles cence.6 Yet, prevention studies typically have focused narrowly on a specific
outcome, such as preventing substance abuse, and on attitudes and social
influences that predict that
outcome.7, 8 Previous studies on prevention have not sought to address the shared risk and protective factors for diverse health - risk behaviors that are the main threats to adolescent health.
Understanding how ACEs
influence health - risk behaviors and health
outcomes is perhaps easiest done by reviewing the ACE Pyramid
Model (see Figure 1).
Other studies have shown that the number of psychiatric disorders a person has is related to life
outcomes in young adulthood, 5 and that co-occurring mental disorders, to a small extent,
influenced the consequences of anxiety and depression.3, 4, 23 More general personal traits such as childhood temperament and intellectual abilities are other individual factors that may be of importance, 26, 29 but the effects of intellectual function and psychiatric disease seem independent of each other.25 Our results indicated an
influence of family factors, as indicated by the attenuation of OR in
model 3.
Sociodemographic characteristics were included as controls in the
models on the basis of numerous studies that document associations between these markers and behavioral
outcomes.15 Multiple indicators of positive (eg, closeness, safety) and negative (eg, aggression, negative
influence) dimensions of family, school, and community contexts were included on the basis of previous research.1, 7,11 — 15
Major drivers to out - of - home care or poorer
outcomes subsequent to care include lack of role
models, increased rates of autism amongst children, inter-generational trauma, placement in non-indigenous contexts and lack of understanding of cultural connections and community input, the
influence of substance abuse and incarceration, and, critically, male domestic violence.
Many of the covariates in typical regression
models represent potential causal pathways by which the neighborhood may
influence the
outcome.
In order to understand the
influence of early care and education on children's
outcomes, an ecological
model needs to be applied that will consider key aspects of the family environment that have also been found to
influence children's competencies.
Second, we will enter explanatory variables into the
models to determine which factors have the most
influence on
outcomes and inequalities in these
outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children.
The theoretical
model is based on a dynamic developmental systems approach to problematic family functioning, which points to the importance of developmental systems, including family risk context and key influential social interactional systems, and emphasizes
influence that is directly pertinent to the
outcome of interest.
A variety of studies suggest that fathers» engagement positively impacts their children's social competence, 27 children's later IQ28 and other learning
outcomes.29 The effects of fathers on children can include later - life educational, social and family
outcomes.1, 2,26 Children may develop working
models of appropriate paternal behaviour based on early childhood cues such as father presence, 30,31 in turn shaping their own later partnering and parenting dynamics, such as more risky adolescent sexual behaviour32 and earlier marriage.33 Paternal engagement decreases boys» negative social behaviour (e.g., delinquency) and girls» psychological problems in early adulthood.34 Fathers» financial support, apart from engagement, can also
influence children's cognitive development.35
Hilliard and colleagues (2012) outlined a diabetes resilience theoretical
model based on much of this body of literature, but they suggest that most of resilience intervention research conducted thus far has focused on minimizing the
influence of risk factors (i.e., supporting protective factors) for poor diabetes
outcomes.
Once the
outcome models were derived, inverse probability weighting (IPW)[47] was used as a sampling weight to investigate the possible
influence of selective participation on our estimates of association between parental alcohol and offspring conduct problems and depressive symptoms, respectively.
However, this research along with investigations of the Double ABCX
model has failed to examine the
influence of family appraisals on parental
outcomes and measures of adaptation.
Social organization and contextual
model of family stress theories are employed as frameworks for the analyses of how dimensions of military culture
influence parents» life satisfaction, as well as key developmental
outcomes of their adolescents (for example, mental health).
Person - environment fit
models have been extensively used to document the way in which the fit between personality characteristics and various contextual variables at work
influence work related behaviors and
outcomes [17] and offers a valuable starting point for understanding the fit between personality traits and teamwork requirements.
Furthermore, multilevel
modeling enables the
influence of person - specific factors on
outcome variables to be statistically controlled (DeLucia & Pitts, 2006).