Yale's «Six Americas» report found that the highly skeptical are more
informed about climate change science than those who report a high degree of concern about it (the latter of whom still regularly confuse climate with the ozone hole, etc.).
Not exact matches
The initiative encourages Americans to think of
climate change as a risk management issue; the panel aims to clarify and contextualize the
science so the public and decision - makers can be more adequately
informed about those risks and possible ways to manage them.
The Review is a super refined weekly web publication curated by subject matter experts from Yale who summarize important research articles from leading natural and social
science journals with the hope that people can make more
informed decisions using latest research results.The Review launched this week and covers a wide range of topics, like this brief
about climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
climate change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity
change and biodiversity («Biodiversity Left Behind in
Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
Climate Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity
Change Scenarios»): They find that simply using the traditional classification of a species in
climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversit
climate change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity
change simulations can underestimate the true scale of biodiversity loss.
A group of Iowa high school students helped report a statewide investigation into classroom
science instruction that found that «nearly half of teachers surveyed by IowaWatch journalists teach
climate change «as theory,
informing students
about the variety of thought that exists.
re «an unqualified «the
science is settled»» People
informed about climate change, and particularly scientists, don't talk like that.
In no way do my values suggest that debate should be curtailed: I merely insist that a scientific debate should take place in the scientific literature and that the public be put in a position where it can make an
informed judgment
about the voices that are opposing mainstream
science on crucial issues ranging from
climate change to vaccination.
Given that there is still much we do not know
about climate change — including why mean global temperature has been flat for the past ten years — undermining confidence in
climate science can (further) undermine its ability to
inform policy.
Overall, the Panel finds that given the current state of the
science and the scope of resources available, the 2013 National
Climate Assessment does a reasonable job of fulfilling its charge to inform the President, the Congress, and the nation about the current state of scientific knowledge regarding climate change e
Climate Assessment does a reasonable job of fulfilling its charge to
inform the President, the Congress, and the nation
about the current state of scientific knowledge regarding
climate change e
climate change effects.
Ordinary people do not look to the
science or the data sets to
inform them
about climate change.
«In the scientific field of
climate studies — which is
informed by many different disciplines — the consensus is demonstrated by the number of scientists who have stopped arguing
about what is causing
climate change — and that's nearly all of them,» according to Skeptical
Science, a website dedicated to explaining the science of global w
Science, a website dedicated to explaining the
science of global w
science of global warming.
(Skeptical
Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been
Science) When these politicians are asked
about the basis for their positions on
climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have
informed an opinion on
climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been
science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f
climate change has been based.
On p. 233 of Why We disagree
About Climate Change, in Box 7.1, I make the statement «Risbey goes on to accuse those who do not adopt such urgent language in their descriptions of the
science as failing in their civic duty in
inform the public, a «scientific reticence» which falls short of the standards of impartial communication».
(16 July) On p. 233 of Why We disagree
About Climate Change, in Box 7.1, I make the statement «Risbey goes on to accuse those who do not adopt such urgent language in their descriptions of the
science as failing in their civic duty in
inform the public, a «scientific reticence» which falls short of the -LSB-...]
If a public debate
about climate change and energy policies were permitted, and if the values that
inform the interpretation of
climate science were open to democratic contest, the climategate emails would be inconsequential.
Susan was the Senior
Science Writer on all three National
Climate Assessments, authoritative reports written in plain language to better inform policymakers and the public about climate change and its effects on our
Climate Assessments, authoritative reports written in plain language to better
inform policymakers and the public
about climate change and its effects on our
climate change and its effects on our nation.
The stated goal of the National
Climate Assessment is to inform the president, Congress, and the public about up - to - date science on climate change and its effects in t
Climate Assessment is to
inform the president, Congress, and the public
about up - to - date
science on
climate change and its effects in t
climate change and its effects in the U.S.
Long before they supplied millions of dollars to conservative think - tanks who misinformed the public
about climate science, Exxon's own scientists
informed them of the scientific consensus that fossil fuel burning would cause disruptive
climate change.
People can educate themselves
about the
science behind
climate change, and stay
informed about policies regarding
climate change.
The Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, with their similar missions to promote the use of
science to benefit society and to
inform critical policy debates, offer this new publication as a key reference document for decision makers, policy makers, educators, and other individuals seeking authoritative answers
about the current state of
climate change science.