Sentences with phrase «infrastructure spending over»

During the campaign, President - elect Trump called for committing at least $ 500 billion to infrastructure spending over five years.

Bob Sewell, president and CEO of Oakville's Bellwether Investment Management, does think that some companies, and their shareholders, could benefit from the infrastructure spending over time.

The government did pledge $ 47 billion to infrastructure spending over the next 10 years and extended the accelerated capital cost allowance for manufactures — a tax relief program for investments in new machinery and equipment — by two years, which means stock holders could get a boost if public companies are able to take advantage of this spending and savings.

Not exact matches

This is happening at a time when the Ontario government has committed to spending $ 160 billion over 12 years to improve Ontario infrastructure.

Does Salesforce's commitment to spending $ 400 million on AWS infrastructure over the next four years have anything to do with Amazon signing a deal to give its employees access to all of Salesforce's products?

The provincial government is spending $ 19 billion on infrastructure such as roads and schools over the next three years.

Tax cuts, infrastructure spending and corporate cash repatriation should remain positive for U.S. markets over the next couple of years, but Rogers sees better opportunities internationally.

Capital spending on major mining, energy and infrastructure projects in Australia is set to drop more than 60 per cent over the next three years, according to analysis by ANZ Banking Group.

And the other main source of economic growth over the next couple of years will come from government spending, led by the federal government's infrastructure program.

President Donald Trump plans to spend $ 1 trillion on infrastructure over the next decade, but exactly what that will look like has yet to be revealed.

Federal coffers are set to dole out $ 186.7 billion in infrastructure money over the next 12 years, but the most recent federal budget indicated about one - quarter of planned spending between 2016 and 2019 was being moved to future years.

The federal Liberals came to power a year ago in large part on their promise to invest $ 120 billion in infrastructure over the next decade, essentially doubling Ottawa's spending from the previous 10 years.

From November on, Wall Street's excitement over Trump's campaign promises to greatly increase infrastructure spending and build a massive wall across the border to Mexico led to huge stock gains.

President Trump, meanwhile, is yet to comment publicly on the Hyperloop, though he has pledged spending $ 1 trillion on U.S. infrastructure over the next decade.

In federal and provincial budgets infrastructure spending is in fact amortized over its service life rather than recognized when it is put in place.

More stimulus such as infrastructure spending could boost nominal GDP by up to 2.5 percent over the next two years, I estimate.

For example, investor Jack Bogle predicted at the outset of the Trump administration that the president's proposed infrastructure spending would be good for the economy in the short term but would be detrimental to the economy, stock market and society over the long run.

Professor Scarthe also recommends that, once the deficit is eliminated in 2015 - 16, any future government should gradually start creating a deficit by, for example, spending on infrastructure and this could be done while at the same time maintaining a stable debt to GDP ratio of around 25 per cent over the medium to longer term.

Overall, this budget adds new details about how Ottawa will spend some of the $ 93 billion in new money the Liberals had already set out for infrastructure — $ 11.2 billion will go to affordable housing over the next 11 years, less than the $ 12.6 billion over eight years the Federation of Canadian Municipalities says was needed.

In other words, over the next five years, this government is planning to spend more money on income splitting for a small number of well off families, a promise made during the 2011 election, than on supporting economic growth and job creation through new spending on research and infrastructure and lowering taxes on investment.

Since the November election, in fact, the company has gained more than 44 percent on optimism over President Trump's pledge to spend $ 1 trillion on U.S. infrastructure.

Let me briefly mention a few steps that could be taken to increase the economy's potential over time — immigration policies that attract workers with scarce skills to the United States; education policies and job retraining programs that build and replenish human capital; spending on infrastructure to remove bottlenecks; tax simplification and the elimination of tax policies that distort investment and saving decisions; regulatory policies that are attentive to costs and benefits and that emphasize getting the incentives right.

Muni bonds» favorable tax exemption was created a little over 100 years ago to attract investors of all stripes, not just those at the very top of the socioeconomic ladder, to help boost infrastructure spending.

On the spending side of the ledger, the priorities have been agriculture support (after two weak monsoons), rural development spending, infrastructure investments and a massive structural shift to direct benefit transfers deposited in the bank accounts of beneficiaries — made possible by the extraordinary biometric identity card program (Aadhaar) covering 950 million people, and the impressive financial inclusion initiative which has opened over 200 million new bank accounts for impoverished families.

These allocation changes are based on the expectation that the enthusiasm over Trump de-regulation, tax reform, and infrastructure spending is justified and will not face a countercurrent from excessively protectionist measures.

Clement says the incident was a «mistake» and had nothing to do with recent controversies over his role in G8 infrastructure spending.

One the most amazing things about this budget is that one of its three focuses will actually be the opposite of what itâ $ ™ s touting. Youâ $ ™ ll likely hear that $ 14 billion will be spent on infrastructure over the next 10 years (actually you may hear much bigger numbers but they just re-announce existing programs like the -LSB-...]

OTTAWA — A five - year $ 50 - billion public infrastructure spending initiative would generate a return on investment to Canadians over the long term as high as $ 3.83 per dollar spent, trigger significant private sector investment and stimulate wage increases, according to a new study by an independent economic modelling firm.

She echoed Mayor Mandel's oft - heard comment that Edmontonians should not settle for «good - enough» and spent much of her speech praising his progress on infrastructure, transportation and arts issues over the past nine - years.

Over four years, the NDP is borrowing $ 34 - billion for infrastructure spending.

The first budget of Premier Rachel Notley «s NDP government includes a 15 percent increase in capital spending over the next five years, with a goal to create jobs and tackle the province's aging and neglected hospitals, schools, roads and other public infrastructure.

Business investment has also improved over the year, and Ottawa's long - delayed infrastructure spending program began to show results in third quarter data, the BoC said.

Fueling the rebound is rising demand amid tightening supplies, thanks in part to Donald Trump's stunning White House win and the likelihood that he'll move forward with a plan to spend $ 1 trillion on infrastructure over the next decade, driving incremental demand for zinc.

We do not need to spend the most to win, we can get richer over time, we need the infrastructure for this and we can finally see changes which appear to address this issue.

The # 25bn a year for infrastructure investment, # 8bn over the next Parliament for social care and yesterday's pledges on education spending were all more or less as expected.

Over the past two years, when the economy was totally stagnant, and when our economy has needed a quick and fast - acting shot in the arm, we have advocated a temporary VAT cut — alongside infrastructure spending, action on youth unemployment and targeted tax measures for business as part of our five point plan for growth.

For this reason, we welcome the # 23bn National Productivity Investment Fund, to be spent on improving innovation and infrastructure over the next five years.

Saying that the nation's infrastructure has been neglected for too long, while the U.S. has spent billions fixing roads and bridges in overseas locations including Iraq and Afghanistan, Congressman Brian Higgins has introduced a trillion - dollar proposal to fix domestic roads, bridges and waterways over the next five years.

Senate Democrats in January introduced their own $ 180 billion infrastructure spending package that proposed sweeping upgrades to the nation's roadways, bridges and other transportation systems over the next decade.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo wants New York state to spend another $ 125 billion on infrastructure improvement projects over the next five years.

Discussion over how to spend the settlement cash has included suggestions from the state Legislature that include boosting education aid, as well as funding new infrastructure projects.

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP)-- Gov. Andrew Cuomo wants New York state to spend another $ 125 billion on infrastructure improvement projects over the next five years.

The amount of money the federal government has kicked in for infrastructure projects has gone down over the years and a long - term infrastructure spending bill has yet to be passed by Congress and the state is not helping much either.

The NPP administration which takes over the reins of government from January 7, 2017, has promised a higher infrastructure spending to eliminate economic bottlenecks as part of a plan for annual double - digit growth over the next four years.

Still, Cuomo has sought to invest heavily in mass transit infrastructure, spending $ 100 billion over the next five years on capital spending projects at the MTA.

Source: GNA More Headlines in Education KNUST to spend $ 5.6 million to retool its laboratories GIMPA Council meets tomorrow over impasse Vote of no confidence passed in Amoako - Nuama - led GIMPA Council Poultry industry receives boost with installation of new incubators at KNUST KNUST initiates «chocopreneurship» training to increase uses of cocoa Latest KNUST to spend $ 5.6 million to retool its laborato... GIMPA Council meets tomorrow over impasse Vote of no confidence passed in Amoako - Nuama - led G... Poultry industry receives boost with installation... KNUST initiates «chocopreneurship» training to inc... Teachers to rain curses on gov» t over unpaid salar... Gov» t to fast track infrastructure dev» t in polyte... Adisadel College wins 2016 Nat» l Science & Ma... Aftermath of assault; St. John's teachers tr... 10,000 books presented to Central Region schools b...

Trump pushed his White House team to craft a plan for $ 1 trillion in infrastructure spending that would pressure states to streamline local permitting, favor renovation of existing roads and highways over new construction and prioritize projects that can quickly begin construction.

While spending $ 1.26 trillion over the next five years might seem steep to some, Higgins says the nation is already losing money - and jobs - as the result of inadequate infrastructure that compromises domestic productivity.

Instead of waiting years to complete planned work and repairs, the city has decided to spend an additional $ 1 billion on infrastructure projects over the next two years.

He promised # 30bn in extra in spending on public services in Scotland and # 40bn on infrastructure over the next decade, financed by heavier taxes and borrowing.