Sentences with phrase «infringe apple»

Samsung recently sought a declaration that that three of its Galaxy tablet computers do not infringe Apple's designs.

The judge, Colin Birss, ruled that Apple must put up a notice saying Samsung's Galaxy tablets don't infringe Apple's registered designs.

In what was otherwise a sweeping victory for Apple, the jury agreed with Samsung that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 does not infringe Apple's iPad - related design patent, shortly referred to as the D'889 patent.

British Courts have decided that Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablet devices do not infringe Apple designs, and the Korean company contacted Pocket - lint to explain all.The High Court of England & Wales today ruled that there were recognisable differences between... Read more

Last week, we talked about a UK high court ruling that the Samsung Galaxy Tab does not infringe Apple's iPad design patent.

In the latest US case, the jury decided that some, but not all, Samsung products infringed Apple's utility and design patents.

The six - woman, two - man jury calculated the damages based on 13 products that infringed Apple's patents.

A jury in 2012 held that Samsung's phones infringed Apple's utility and design patents; Apple was originally granted $ 1.05 billion in damages — that amount was later reduced.

Steve Jobs during a meeting with Eric Schmidt indicated that he throught Google were infringing Apple's IP rights

By reinstating the verdict, the court is saying that there was substantial evidence to prove that Samsung infringed Apple's patents.

The International Trade Commission today found Samsung guilty of infringing Apple design patents covering software scrolling behavior and headphone jack capability.

A Tokyo court has today found Samsung guilty of infringing an Apple «bounce - back» or «rubber banding» patent that covers the popular scrolling feature built into its iOS platform.

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules for Samsung in dispute over damages owed for infringing Apple's patent iPhone designs pic.twitter.com/g0y 5VjiRks

Not exact matches

U.S. District Court Judge William Conley on Tuesday ruled that Apple should pay $ 506 million in damages for allegedly infringing a patent owned by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF).

Qualcomm filed a separate civil lawsuit accusing Apple of infringing the patents at issue in that action.

Apple, which won a federal suit in California that Samsung infringed on iPhone patents, is trying to get the courts to force Samsung to stop selling older Galaxy products in the U.S..

(g) Further, you agree that if the online services, or your possession and use of the online services, infringes on a third party's intellectual property rights, you will not hold Apple responsible for the investigation, defense, settlement and discharge of any such intellectual property infringement claims.

Did Apple infringe?

Apple got a boost late Friday when the International Trade Commission ruled that rival Samsung infringed on some of its iPhone - related patents for older Galaxy phones and tablets.

MTel sued Apple last year, claiming that services on the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch (particularly iMessage, emojis and calendar invitations) infringed on a number of its patents that cover pager technology.

A federal jury has ruled that Apple must pay $ 23.6 million to Mobile Telecommunications Technologies (MTel) for infringing on five of its patents, which cover pager technology.

As the New York Times reported in late August, it may be easier for Apple to go after phone makers in lawsuits, because damages can be determined by the number of phones a company sold that were made using infringed patents.

Apple sought $ 2.5 - billion US to $ 2.75 - billion US for its claims that Suwon, South Korea - based Samsung infringed four design patents and three software patents in copying the iPhone and iPad.

Samsung's demand for as much as $ 421.8 - million US in royalties was based on claims that Apple infringed five patents.

It won a preliminary ruling last month from a U.S. trade panel that HTC infringed two of Apple's patents.

Texas court rules that Apple must pay out for infringing six, decades - old patents held by pager and telco firm, MTel

The awardof $ 23.6 m was a tenth of what the firm was claiming: it wanted $ 1 for every infringing device sold, which would have totalled $ 237m, according to Apple's lawyer Brian Ferguson.

MTel had claimed in court that Apple's iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, as well as its Airport Wi - Fi routers, infringed the patents, particularly through the firm's iMessage feature and its email apps.

This week, Qualcomm fired its own counter-attack in Germany, where it alleges Apple is infringing on two power amplification / power management patents and is seeking to ban iPhone 7 imports into Germany.

U.S. industry groups representing Apple, IBM and other tech giants have blamed China's rules on inbound investment for infringing the intellectual property rights of U.S. companies.

It certainly stands in stark contrast to the approach of tech companies like Apple, which are suing their rivals all over the world for infringing on patents like the one it holds for rounded corners.

In May, Lodsys filed lawsuits against seven small software development firms, claiming the apps they create to run on Apple's iOS and Google's Android mobile operating systems infringe their patents.

And if you're wondering about the name and whether it infringes the copyrights of any well - known MP3 players, fear not — the car's key functions are all controlled via an Apple iPhone.

Apple's response to our detailed inquiries was to tell us that our plans did not infringe their rules in any way, which was true at the time, but there is one little catch.

American computer giant Apple claimed on Monday that Samsung Electronics» latest tablet computer infringes on patents relating to touch screen technology.

The court has ruled the newly redesigned Galaxy Tab 10.1 N does not infringe on any of Apple's patent rights and its touchscreen technology.

It is the «acting in concert» bit in the above ruling that Apple is citing, while extending its tirade against retailers as well that are engaged in selling the devices it claims has infringed its patents.

In the latest blow to Apple, Dutch court has ruled the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 does not infringe upon Apple iPad's design patents.

The judge backed Apple's claim that Samsung's tablet infringed on its patents and copied elements of the iPad 2.»

Instead of letting the market decide which tablet will dominate, Apple has made it so that any device that looks like a tablet is in fact infringing on their intellectual property!

The ruling also points out the court has been convinced of Samsung having infringed upon at least two of Apple's patents relating to touchscreen and multitouch.

Apart from the location, the other differentiating factor to Samsung's legal pursuit against Apple concerning technology patents where Samsung is accusing the Connecticut based company of having infringed on at least three of its tech patents.

Speculators believe Samsung is chasing Apple in France for having infringed on its patents related to UMTS radio technology that finds application in 3G data networks.

Apple has been accusing Samsung of having infringed in its design and tech patents though interestingly, it has failed to get an injunction on the sale of Samsung tablet in its own home country while having already achieved that in all cases everywhere.

Apple petitioned the U.S. District Court... in July for a preliminary injunction prohibiting Samsung... from selling, offering to sell, or importing... products including the Galaxy S 4G and the Galaxy Tab 10.1... claiming these products infringed its patents.

Apple and Samsung have been in a constant battle as Apple claims that Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets infringes on their designs for the iPhone and iPad.

Last year, Apple sued HTC for infringing on iPhone patents covering the graphical user interface and the underlying design.

A US judge on Monday said a Kodak patent allegedly infringed upon by Apple and Blackberry - maker Research In Motion (RIM) was not valid, dealing another blow to the struggling photography pioneer.

Unless of course Apple decides to derail their plans and claim they infringed on their processor...

Apple has went after manufacturers in a number of different countries and one of the cases was in the UK where they claimed that Samsung infringed upon the iPad with their line of Galaxy Tab tablets.