I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not
infringing on anyone's right to
practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming
religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and
religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
However, safety concerns were not sufficient to outweigh a Sikh student's right to wear a kirpan (ceremonial dagger) to school in the case of Multani c. Marguerite - Bourgeoys (Commission scolaire).31 In upholding the student's claim, the Supreme Court emphasized that
religious tolerance is important in Canada and that measures that might
infringe on religious adherents» beliefs ought to be tempered, to the extent possible, in order to accommodate the free exercise of those beliefs and
religious practices.32