Sentences with phrase «infringement case regarding»

Not exact matches

Sony issued a formal statement today on the matter of user - created levels being deleted from LittleBigPlanet, saying the «vast majority of content uploaded to date has been fun and suitable for all of our community members,» but that «In a very few cases we have upheld complaints regarding unsuitable content or infringement of intellectual property, with less than 0.5 % of levels actively moderated as a result of complaints from other users.»

Lewis Galoob Toys Inc said last Friday that it had been told by Judge Fern Smith that the court had ruled in favour of Galoob in a copyright - infringement case brought by Nintendo of America Inc regarding the Galoob product, Game Genie.

In 2005, a court decision regarding the case of Bridgeport v. Dimension determined that it is possible for mashup artists to be guilty of copyright infringement even if a one second sample of music is used.

In this regard, we could even point to the Court's earlier case law referred to as authoritative by the Court itself in paragraph 30, where it reiterates the need to pursue «common objectives» and «same objectives» for the finding of participation in an infringement of Article 101 TFEU.

Where copyright in a work is infringed by its being performed, played or shown in public by means of apparatus for receiving visual images or sounds conveyed by electronic means, the person by whom the visual images or sounds are sent, and in the case of a performance the performers, shall not be regarded as responsible for the infringement

For example, in the patent infringement area, issues regarding when the entire market value rule is applicable, as well as in what cases an apportionment of the royalty base value is appropriate, have been a focus of the courts.

You can speak to a copyright or patent attorney regarding your copyright infringement or patent infringement case at no initial cost.

While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding actual malice, 175 three matters must be stressed: first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the public figure concept.

The kinds of representation we provide involve: (1) litigation and appeals regarding a wide variety of legal issues; (2) employment disputes, including discrimination claims and accusations of noncompliance with wage and hour laws; (3) intellectual property matters regarding patents, trademarks and copyright infringements; (4) commercial real estate matters; (5) business law disputes; and (6) alternative dispute resolution («ADR») matters, including mediation and arbitration cases.

Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of patents.

It has a long - standing relationship with the Force India Formula One Team, acting for it in High Court proceedings against Team Lotus F1 regarding an alleged case of copyright infringement.

At Gorodissky & Partners, notable work included representing Russian confectioner Chocolate Toy in a copyright infringement dispute; defending Decor Rus against an infringement action brought by a competitor; and representing Perfetti Van Melle in a trade mark infringement case filed by New Technologies regarding its «FOOTBALL» mark.

cases and subsequent denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court pose significant questions regarding jury awards for copyright infringement, particularly in cases of mid to low - income infringers.

The copyright agent is the person you designate to handle copyright infringement claims regarding your websites — basically, it's the contact person you've registered with the government in case anyone wants to claim that you violated their copyright.