It was his caustic honesty about the complex nature of global warming, and
the inherent uncertainties in the science, that kept me returning to him for input from 1988 onward.
Not exact matches
Especially if you are versed
in the underlying
science, you'll see that it presents two kinds of
uncertainties — those
inherent in climate models, and those
in the emission scenarios that are fed into the models.
According to Richard's analysis, the 485 new papers underscore the «significant limitations and
uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes,» which
in turn suggests that climate
science is not nearly as settled as media reports and some policymakers would have people believe.
I think part of this comes from scientists, both those working
in that specific area of climate
science and particularly those from outside that area, speaking not as scientists with their
inherent tendency not to claim something conclusive without a good deal of statistically tested certainty, but speaking as someone who has been imposed upon or volunteered to give a scientific best guess without bothering the public with the details of
uncertainties.
Climate
science results will simply be by - passed because of the ever - present small
uncertainties inherent in all predictions.
While climate
science can effectively inform us about the range of possible consequences of a warming world, there is a large amount of irresolvable
uncertainty inherent in climate forecasting.
There are
uncertainties inherent in estimating the magnitude of indirect land use emissions from biofuels, but a policy that implicitly or explicitly assigns a value of zero is clearly not supported by the
science.
«There are
uncertainties inherent in estimating the magnitude of indirect land use emissions from biofuels, but a policy that implicitly or explicitly assigns a value of zero is clearly not supported by the
science,» states the letter, which is signed by experts from the World Bank, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and a wide array of academic institutions, among others.
We have the «scientist» who understands the questions,
uncertainties and doubts that are
inherent in Climate
Science with the scientific ethos of full disclosure of all those, and the «human being» who for the good of the planet must address the non scientific audience with dramatic, simplified, scary and non realistic scenarios.
Are you frustrated by climate sceptics using
uncertainty —
inherent in any area of complex
science — as a justification for delaying policy responses?