For a long time now, I have been preaching that pit bulls aren't
inherently dangerous dogs.
Not exact matches
The restrictions are based on assumptions that certain breeds are
inherently dangerous, that such
dogs can be reliably identified and that the restrictions will improve public safety, the study states.
Anyone who claims that a
dog is never
inherently violent and
dangerous, I suggest you do a quick google for the Caucasian Mountain Shepherd.
While these
dogs are not
inherently dangerous, the terrier in them means that they have a strong prey drive — this as an instinct to chase small animals.
Since the 1980s, the media have falsely portrayed the pitbull as a bloodthirsty monster,
inherently more
dangerous than other strong breeds of
dog.
The improper management of these
dogs is
inherently dangerous.
The pitbull is not the first
dog to be seen as
inherently dangerous.
Pit bull terrier
dogs and puppies are the most frequently and unjustly targeted by breed discriminatory legislation as
inherently vicious, aggressive and
dangerous, though this is not the case, as shown by research, studies and policies from the National Canine Research Council, the Center for Disease Control and the American Bar Association.
If
dogs like these —
dogs who were trained, fought and abused — can become loving family members, how can anyone say that pit bull type
dogs are
inherently dangerous?
Two words to prove pit bull type
dogs are
inherently dangerous: «BREAK STICK».
But the appeals court decided to declare pit bull - type
dogs inherently dangerous because of their «vicious nature» and ability to inflict harm.
The idea that pit bull - type
dogs were bred for fighting and are therefore
inherently dangerous is a common myth.
Recent events of
dog mauling have brought to public attention the issue of «
dangerous dogs.There is a great deal of fear and misperception among the public regarding specific breeds of
dogs that are thought to be
inherently aggressive.
The restriction is based on the assumption that certain breeds of
dogs are
inherently dangerous or aggressive, and in response to a number of highly publicized
dog bites and attacks made by animals identified as pit bull - type
dogs.
This change in attitude is not because the
dogs themselves have transformed into different beings or are «
inherently» aggressive and
dangerous to begin with, as some claim.
And if the APBT is so
inherently dangerous, how come they are so successful as therapy
dogs?
It is not
inherently dangerous for your
dog, but animal - based fats are always more biologically valuable.
No
dog is
inherently dangerous:
dog owners are the cause and the solution.
Dog lovers and animal advocates across the nation are outraged at a Maryland court ruling suggesting that pit bulls are an «
inherently dangerous» breed.
(b) Though no specific breed of
dog is
inherently dangerous or vicious, the growing pet overpopulation and lack of regulation of animal breeding practices necessitates a repeal of the ban on breed - specific solutions and a more immediate alternative to existing laws.