Sentences with phrase «inherently more flawed»

I don't know if that's because its hardware was inherently more flawed, or a symptom of marketplace realities (the expense of console development conditions against console exclusives for third parties, as well as against experimentation, while DS development had neither of those mitigating factors).

Not exact matches

More broadly, the lesson is that it's hard to take an inherently flawed concept like a large regressive tax cut enacted at a time of low unemployment, rising interest rates, and high debt, and then tack on extra provisions that make it workable.

The likelihood of more than one designer who, while intelligent, has made and has admitted to making numerous mistakes; has moved on to better and more complicated designs and really has no interest in us, a product of an earlier and inherently flawed creation / design

Nash promises to demonstrate that character education is a «deeply and seriously flawed» project, «unnecessarily apocalyptic... inherently authoritarian in its convictions... excessively nostalgic and premodern in its understanding of virtue, too closely aligned with a reactionary... politics, anti-intellectual in its curricular initiatives, hyperbolic in its moral claims, dangerously antidemocratic,» and more.

There is no objective, empirical or historical case that can be made that Communism is better, more fair, or has any preferable outcomes over most Western democracies, and that is because the political philosophical case for Marxism is inherently flawed.

Most people consider the claim that blacks are inherently more criminal than whites, based on that raw data, to be pretty darn racist as it ignores the social, economic and legal context of crime and instead ascribes it to some imagined genetic or cultural flaw among African Americans.

Along the same lines, I do not find credible arguments that any product of peer review is therefore inherently corrupted by tribalism — any more than I feel that any «skeptical» analysis in the «skeptical» blogosphere is inherently flawed due to tribalism among «skeptics» as a group.

LawyerRatingz itself cautions users, «[r] emember, we have no way of knowing who is doing the rating — customers, people in the industry, regular people, dogs, cats, etc.» Perhaps more fundamentally, if legal services are truly «credence goods» such that their quality is very difficult for consumers to ascertain, using subjective experiences as an indicia of quality would seem to be inherently flawed.