Sentences with phrase «initial plaintiffs in the case»

Not exact matches

My initial point is the headline belies the facts on which the case turned in favour of the plaintiff... which is namely....

If the initial complaint or other earlier filings had contained a claim for punitive damages, or even an allegation that the defendants acted maliciously, willfully, recklessly, wantonly, fraudulently, or in bad faith, the Court would have likely allowed the punitive damages issue to be heard by the jury, and the plaintiff may have received a larger award at the conclusion of the case.

In addition to lectures to licensed lawyers seeking to further their legal skills, Annes has also co-authored several publications including the chapter «Initial Client Contact» in the book Medical Malpractice, published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education and the chapter «Physical Injuries: Plaintiff's Perspective» in the book Proving and Disproving Damages in Personal Injury Cases, also published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal EducatioIn addition to lectures to licensed lawyers seeking to further their legal skills, Annes has also co-authored several publications including the chapter «Initial Client Contact» in the book Medical Malpractice, published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education and the chapter «Physical Injuries: Plaintiff's Perspective» in the book Proving and Disproving Damages in Personal Injury Cases, also published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Educatioin the book Medical Malpractice, published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education and the chapter «Physical Injuries: Plaintiff's Perspective» in the book Proving and Disproving Damages in Personal Injury Cases, also published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Educatioin the book Proving and Disproving Damages in Personal Injury Cases, also published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Educatioin Personal Injury Cases, also published by Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education.

As the case was filed in federal court, the court first turned to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 (c)(1)(A), determining that the court should look to Georgia law in order to determine whether the plaintiff's amendment may relate back to her initial complaint.

During this initial case, the defendants discovered that the mother and sister were intentionally excluding the brother from being a plaintiff and had lied in their deposition testimony regarding his existence.

Indeed, the plaintiff did not identify the physician who prepared the affidavit as an expert who would ultimately provide trial testimony in her initial disclosure, and in interrogatory responses to the defendant, she stated that she «has not yet made any election as to what expert or experts, if any, she intends to use at any hearing or the trial of the case.»

Accordingly, when evaluating the plaintiff's case during the initial client meeting and when building the case over the course of the litigation, the plaintiff's pre-accident health and employment history are critical tools in proving that the plaintiff's symptoms were caused or contributed to by the motor vehicle accident.

[34] In addition, given that the original trial estimate was exceeded by the plaintiff's case, necessitating the adjournment of the trial that caused the hiatus that brought about the acquisition of new evidence by the defendants, I am unable to accept that the delay resulting from the proposed evidence should have been treated any differently from the delay that was occasioned by the initial inadequate trial time estimate.

My initial point is the headline belies the facts on which the case turned in favour of the plaintiff... which is namely....