The proceedings arose out of a possession order obtained against the second appellant and an anti-social behaviour
injunction against both appellants, in December 2004, which they appealed.
The second was an action
against Maroun and Cobra Hanna («Hanna») in relation to which the
appellant claimed that the lawyers failed to take proper steps to enforce a payment agreement relating to a prior judgment
against Hanna and failed to advise the
appellant of the requirement to make full and frank disclosure when applying for a Mareva
injunction, leading to the
appellant having to accept an improvident settlement.