The only reliable forum for infringers to undermine Canadian patents is the Federal Court, where they risk monetary judgments and
injunctions against infringement.
Not exact matches
Harper Seeks
Injunction in Dispute with Open Road — HarperCollins has just upped the ante in their lawsuit against Open Road, filing for a permanent injunction to block the publication of the digital version of Julie of the Wolves, as well as monetary damages for «willful infringement» of HarperCollins» alleged
Injunction in Dispute with Open Road — HarperCollins has just upped the ante in their lawsuit
against Open Road, filing for a permanent
injunction to block the publication of the digital version of Julie of the Wolves, as well as monetary damages for «willful infringement» of HarperCollins» alleged
injunction to block the publication of the digital version of Julie of the Wolves, as well as monetary damages for «willful
infringement» of HarperCollins» alleged... more >
Folks, this is very big... In the latest turn of events in LG vs Sony legal fight concerning various patents
infringement, The civil court of justice from Hague sided with LG and ordered a preliminary
injunction against Sony.
Crytek has demanded «all direct damages (estimated to be in excess of $ 75,000), indirect damages, consequential damages (including lost profits), special damages, costs, fees, and expenses incurred by reason of Defendants» breach of contract and copyright
infringement» as well as a cut of the profit, punitive damages, and a permanent
injunction against CIG's use of CryEngine.
Apple's winning streak continues for now: after (finally) obtaining a preliminary
injunction against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and winning by a wide margin a battle over a long list of expert reports, Apple has just been cleared of
infringement of one of the three Samsung patents it was attacking in its very focused summary judgment motions.
On September 27, The Gap filed a trademark
infringement suit seeking an
injunction against Gapnote.
The Court granted an
injunction against Mr Mc Fadden and ordered him to pay damages and the costs of the formal notice due to a direct
infringement.
Concretely, the referring court in Tobias Mc Fadden v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH asks under which circumstances and to what extent operators of publicly accessible Wi - Fi networks can be held liable for
infringements of works protected by copyright, and what type of
injunctions can be ordered
against such operators.
For intermediaries, or providers of ISSs, this means that
injunctions can be ordered
against them to put an end to
infringements of IPRs, or possibly to prevent such
infringements.
Interestingly, the latter case the referring court also inquires what kind of
injunctions can be ordered
against intermediaries that facilitate copyright
infringements.
These questions deal with three particular issues: whether damages for copyright
infringement can be claimed from an ISS, whether an
injunction can be ordered
against a «mere conduit» intermediary, and whether an ISS can be held liable for non-compliancy with such an
injunction.
In this space the patents are not standard essential — the owner has no obligation to license them and can pursue
injunctions against any rival that it suspects of
infringement without any restrictions.
On numerous occasions, our lawyers have pursued emergency relief in federal and state courts to protect
against the loss or
infringement of IP rights and trade secrets, including obtaining and defending
against temporary restraining orders and preliminary and permanent
injunctions.
Successfully won permanent
injunction, damages and attorneys» fees representing Taiwanese diving and snorkeling equipment manufacturer
against competitor in patent
infringement action.
This Article builds on these insights by investigating the potential and actual scopes of
injunctions against patent
infringement.
Successfully prosecuted patent
infringement claims
against distributors of infringing home appliances, obtaining
injunctions against infringers.
«Cause» shall mean any of the following events: (i) breach by either party of any of its obligations hereunder; (ii) misappropriation by either party of funds or property of the other party; (iii) any court
injunction or judgment
against either party relating to copyright or trademark
infringement, or other unethical business practices; or (iv) the failure by either party to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder (v) vendor's non-compliance with state or local requirements.
A Maryland federal court entered a preliminary
injunction for copyright
infringement against the company that operates NeighborCity.com,...
A Minnesota federal court has considered whether a multiple listing service was entitled to receive a preliminary
injunction for copyright
infringement against the company that operates NeighborCity.com for its reposting of the MLS's copyrighted listing data without permission.
A Maryland federal court entered a preliminary
injunction for copyright
infringement against the company that operates NeighborCity.com, prohibiting the website from re-posting listing data obtained from a multiple listing service without permission.
The California Association of REALTORS ® («CAR») has received a one million dollar judgment and a permanent
injunction against Equisource Real Estate, Inc., for copyright
infringement resulting from Equisource's posting of the Association's forms on the Internet.