Not exact matches
If you have suffered personal
injury or are the bereaved loved one following a fatal incident then you may pursue a
claim against the party (s) who you hold at fault, the «
defendant»
Here, your
injury lawyer would collect $ 20,000 from the
defendant's insurance company, and then your lawyer could set up a
claim against your own insurance company and collect the full $ 100,000 on the
claim.
Plaintiff
claims to have suffered
injuries in said accident and seeks to recover a judgment
against Defendant for the same.
[1] The plaintiff, David Ellis, has brought an action
against the
defendant, Orlex Saul Fallios - Guthierrez, for battery,
claiming that he suffered significant physical and emotional
injuries.
A typical personal
injury claim against an individual
defendant resolves in one of two ways: (1) settlement with the
defendant, or (more commonly) his or her insurer, either...
The skilled Miami personal
injury attorneys at Friedman Rodman & Frank can help you pursue a
claim against any
defendant, including government employees.
In addition, the
defendant may raise any defenses he or she may have to the allegations as well as any
injury claims the
defendant may have
against the plaintiff.
[6] The plaintiff
claims against the
defendant under all heads of damages for his personal
injuries, in the total sum of $ 739,664.
Attorney John R. Orton settled a
claim against Victoria Insurance Company for the policy limits, arising out of an auto accident, in which our client suffered a knee
injury when the
defendant ran a stop sign.
In a lawsuit, any pre-existing
injuries or prior
injury claims from the victim's past may be used
against them by the
defendant.
This means that it is generally the only recourse available to employees who suffer job - related
injuries, except for third - party
claims against defendants other than their employers or co-workers.
In the event that you have two
claims against a
defendant, one being personal
injury related and other not, you should be explicit in stating in the settlement how much of it relates to the personal
injury claims and which the non-personal
injury claim.
Specifically, in Rafferty v. Merck & Co., Inc., [4] the SJC held that plaintiffs who ingest the generic form of a drug may bring failure to warn
claims against the brand - name manufacturer of the drug if the brand - name
defendant acted recklessly by «intentionally fail [ing] to update the label on its drug while knowing or having reason to know of an unreasonable risk of death or grave bodily
injury associated with its use.»
As an aside, the
claim that personal
injury is more profitable does not take into account the cost of capital and cash flow needed to run cases
against defendants with deep pockets, on a conditional or No Win - No Fee ™ basis.
Later, the plaintiff filed a civil negligence
claim against the
defendant,
claiming that the
defendant's negligence resulted in his
injuries.
This should help to preserve evidence, as well as immediately get a jump start on a
claim against a
defendant likely to ultimately face numerous
claims for
injuries and wrongful death stemming from the same incident.
No
defendant should have to defend himself
against a
claim for an
injury that occurred thirty years ago.
In a recent Texas auto accident decision, a woman appealed from a take nothing judgment after a jury trial in her personal
injury lawsuit
against a
defendant,
claiming injuries when the
defendant's vehicle hit hers from behind.
If you have
claims against more than one
defendant or insurance company, or are considering a lawsuit over the same
injuries against another party, you should also consider whether settling with one
defendant could limit or eliminate your right to pursue the other cases.
This means that we pursue a
claim for your serious, life - threatening
injuries against the
defendants at no cost to you.
If the damages caused in the accident are above and beyond the limits of the blanket fleet policy, your personal
injury lawyer may be able to pursue a
claim against other potential
defendants.
However, Indiana personal
injury and wrongful death
claims against other
defendants may still proceed.
The Claimant, aged 81,
claimed provisional damages
against each of the
Defendants for alleged asbestos — related
injury leading to the development of diffuse pleural thickening and asbestosis.
The plaintiff filed a personal
injury case
against the
defendant,
claiming that his promise of a hard - packed road induced her to accompany him on the ride and that he should be held responsible for her
injuries.
Gardner's personal
injury claim arose from an automobile accident and was filed
against his employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRC), and eight other
defendants, six of whom were not related to UPRC.
Personal
injury lawsuit
claims Uber and its driver are responsible for her serious
injuries A New Mexico woman recently filed an Uber accident lawsuit
against the ride sharing company and its driver behind the wheel the night of her accident over allegations the
defendants» negligence was responsible for her serious
injuries.
With at least six Florida personal
injury lawyers now facing unrelated criminal charges for defrauding auto insurers and the Sunshine State already in the running for this year's # 1 ranking among the nation's Judicial Hellholes, a panel of four federal judges last week imposed nearly $ 9.2 million in sanctions on two Jacksonville - based plaintiffs» firms for their shameless pursuit of more than 1,200 «frivolous and factually baseless lawsuits»
against tobacco
defendants... → Read More: Two Florida Firms» Fraudulent Tobacco
Claims Draw Nearly $ 9.2 Million in Sanctions