And I am very concerned about people who don't get «angry» over
the injustice done to others.
Not exact matches
Just don't use your understanding of Scripture as a tool
to persecute and perpetuate social
injustice against
others
I don't understand where people get this idea, that
to voice anger at one
injustice somehow means that you don't care about any
other injusticies.
the children hurt by these men and the many
others not reported don't deserve
to suffer with these
injustices because the church doesn't want
to face the fact that there is a problem.
He ought
to be the one who, even as he acts with the
others proclaims the
injustice and the unacceptability of what he and they are
doing.
He takes so seriously the injunction
to love God and his neighbor that he can not be at ease before
injustice, evil -
doing, or the suffering of
others.
How far Jesus himself would have extended this
to wrongs
done to others,
to violence against
others, or
to political, economic, and social
injustice is debatable.
Those
others you mentioned as god-less are no worse off then greedy capitalists who pretend
to care about morality but shut their eyes
to all
injustice done to people which God hates, and has plenty
to say about!
Later he realized that, on the one hand, he had
done them a serious
injustice, and that, on the
other hand, every form of Christianity is no less closely bound
to the particularities of culture than are these
other religions.
Curtis Berger shocked his Columbia University Law School associates at a convocation for the opening of the school year by saying, «I
do not assert that legal education makes our graduates evil, but I
do believe that [it makes them] less feeling, less caring, less sensitive
to the needs of
others,... even less alarmed about the
injustices of our society than they were when they entered law school.»
While Wright argues that Jesus speaking
to Roman authorities in John 18 and 19 presents a mandate for political engagement, Boyd points out that Jesus
does not bring up the
injustices of the Roman Empire, nor
other governmental issues, in his dialogue with Pilate.
We are
doing an
injustice in the name of Jesus and will have
to face the consequences for our prejudiced and unloving stance on this issue, like we are
doing on many
other issues.
An unjust state
does not reflect on the justice or
injustice of the citizen in the case where that citizen participates in a limited way, such as rending unto Caesar that which is Caesar's (pay Caesar taxes even if he's going
to use those taxes
to kill innocent people and commit
other injustices), and rending unto God that which is God's (which is all of the important stuff).
It's used
to rationalize religious violence, abuse, corruption, ignorance, bigotry, racism,
injustice, inequality, sexism, hypocrisy and a litany of
other evils — all under the guise of «God told me
to do this» or «The Bible says this.»
In fact, Black Lives Matter doesn't desire partnership with those who practice a prayer - filled non-violent approach
to injustice because they «patently reject any conservative theology about keeping peace, praying copiously, or turning the
other cheek.»
The party was a Church that persuaded its zealots
to renounce all
other interests: a Church that
did not concern itself with the life
to come, because in the Fascist Weltanschauung, as in the Communist, every aspiration has
to be fulfilled in this world and there is no place for a future life in which earthly
injustices may be set
to rights.39
It would be the highest form of
injustice to sell Walcott and keep Welbeck and Giroud.What an overrated bunch of players we have in our team.No wonder 95 % of Arsenal players always fade away in
other teams when they leave.If we are selling Walcott then why aren't we
doing the same
to Giroud and Welbeck.Someone should tell me why Walcott leaves but they should stay.I know many fans feel Walcott hasn't yet turned out
to be world class and all that but looking at his goals it's fair
to say he's
done his bit.If you sell a player in the same scenario as Walcott you sell him because he failed.But have Giroud and Welbeck not failed at what they were supposed
to do?Arsenal is such a stubborn club.It looks like the stories of Eduardo and Van Persie have taught us nothing really.Their injuries denied us the trophies as we had no capable back ups.If Laca gets injured we are doomed mark my words.
To educate of other members of the adoption group and the general public about the injustices done to the First Mother as per coercion, social pressures and wors
To educate of
other members of the adoption group and the general public about the
injustices done to the First Mother as per coercion, social pressures and wors
to the First Mother as per coercion, social pressures and worse.
Commenting on today's decision by the Lord Justice that last year's GCSE English results will not be regraded, Christine Blower, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, the largest teachers» union, said: «It is very clear
to the NUT and the
other organisations who brought this action that a great
injustice has been
done.
«Although this monetary compensation package is welcome and long overdue, what's really important is the official recognition that a grave
injustice was
done to these people and
to hundreds of
other dismissed lesbian and gay soldiers, sailors and air crews.»
The reasoning:
Injustice sold 20k copies on Wii U. see, all Wii U owners needed
to do was buy their
other games....
That
does not mean we have
to agree, it means we should always be mindful of how much energy we spend fighting each
other versus the energy we spend collectively fighting inequality and
injustice.
The action implications of these findings, as well as some of the
dos noted earlier, are
to promote a genuine and broad sense of inclusiveness by educating for true understanding of diversity, especially as manifest in one's own school,
to ensure that school codes of conduct and core values are integrated into everyday routines, including opportunities for student reflection and feedback on student report cards (versus being relegated
to statements in handbooks or on web sites), and
to require that all students are given systematic training in social problem solving or related social - emotional skills and encouraged specifically
to use those skills in finding alternatives
to mistreating
others, seeking help effectively, and upstanding in the presence of
injustice and inequity.
Some students talk with
others who appear lonely and try
to offer friendship; they speak up when they see
injustice because, in the words of one student, they «don't think it is right
to judge people by how they dress.»
If we and the
other families
do not have our day in court and the ability
to stand up for our children, we risk this
injustice continuing and hurting tens of thousands of kids across the state for years
to come.
But I confess I
do find that I'm drawn
to history and historical fiction books about various wars and genocides, prison camps and
other injustices throughout history, particularly those that have occurred throughout the 20th and 21st century.
The
other issue I've had with Amazon is that when someone leaves a review which has nothing at all
to do with the author's work, Amazon could care less about righting such an
injustice.
While it's great that those who want
to write have a vehicle
to publish their own work, especially in this overwhelmed publishing market, those who don't take the time
to learn the craft of writing
do themselves and
others an
injustice.
Now that it's out and the wait is over, how
does Injustice Gods Among Us stack up
to the
other fighting games out there?
The student leaders «begin
to see that if we are truly trying
to have a just society and eradicate one — ism, such as racism, we can not
do it without addressing
other issues such as classism, sexism and environmental
injustice.
Environmental
injustice is an issue faced by countless
other communities across the country, and I want
to do my part
to share our experience and help educate
others on how
to achieve similar successes.
The bottom line is that Spencer was ready
to start whining about the
injustice if his paper was rejected, and he was ready
to start whining if all the
other scientists didn't immediately respond
to his paper within about a year — which is about the same time it took his paper
to be published after he submitted it.
However, in cases where a failure
to give proper disclosure has made a fair trial impossible, or prevented the court from
doing justice, or in instances of a flagrant abuse of process, a superior court will exercise its inherent jurisdiction — its power
to control its own procedure so as
to prevent it from being used
to achieve
injustice —
to strike out the case before or during a trial (see for example Raja v Van Hoogstraten and
others [2006] EWHC 1315 (Ch) and CPR 3.4 (5)-RRB-.
The
other members of the court (Simmons J.A. and Cronk J.A.) in separate concurring reasons,
did not frame the proposition as broadly and cautioned that the jurisdiction
to effect error correction will be precluded where it is tantamount
to a reconsideration of the verdict or sentence or where issues of unfairness or
injustice to the accused or reasonable apprehension of bias arise: (per Cronk J.A. at para. 60).
These channels make sure that there is no
injustice done to any party at the cost of the
other.