The US Probation Department had recommended 6 1/2 to 8 years of prison for Halloran, who tried to claim
insanity as a defense at trial and is a «prince» in a pagan order that includes public floggings.
Could this be a case of
insanity as defense?
Not exact matches
To be sure, there are a few exceptions: in the case of murder, for example, we recognize justifications such
as self -
defense, excuses such
as insanity, and mitigations such
as provocation.
To sum things up I see it
as insanity to devote more money towards the
defense of something than we do towards that something itself.
To the extent that the crime can be understood
as a culmination of an extremist world view, then the perpetrator would be criminally responsible; to the extent that the criminal behavior was a product of a mental illness, he might be eligible for a
defense of diminished capacity or not guilty by reason of
insanity.
And you know that most jurors have little patience for criminal -
defense arguments based on such notions
as «temporary
insanity.»
More over he has confessed this publicly, and the sole «
defense» he can invoke is the «lapse in judgement» which might be pushed
as temporary
insanity.
As further evidence, take the 19th Century case that is said to have introduced the
defense of temporary
insanity in American jurisprudence.