Prolonged family distress and
insecure attachment representation may in turn complicate the development of social skills and make it more difficult to engage in satisfying intimate relationships which may eventually also hamper life - satisfaction during adulthood [12].
The statistically demonstrable connection between the term of the stay in the residential home and an especially
insecure attachment representation does not suggest that such an intervention is efficient.
Insecure attachment representations and child personal narrative structure: implications for delayed discourse in preschool - age children.
Nonclinical participants with
insecure attachment representations showed a global response inhibition to the Stroop task.
As a result, mothers with
insecure attachment representations are much less likely to be sensitive to their babies» cues than mothers with secure representations.39 In fact, research findings implicate
insecure attachment representations — due presumably to maltreatment in infancy — in physical abuse of infants and young children by their parents.40
Furthermore, not enough data was available to include the comparison of secure vs.
insecure attachment representations, because of the low number of securely attached patients in the current sample.
Extending the findings by analyzing differences between each attachment status separately, or between secure and
insecure attachment representations will further portraying the picture of autonomic reactions to social stress in the different attachment representations.
Not exact matches
Usually, these intervention programs are designed to enhance parental sensitivity, the ability to accurately perceive children's
attachment signals, and the ability to respond to these signals in a prompt and appropriate manner.2 The ultimate goal of these interventions is to turn
insecure - avoidant (A) and
insecure - resistant (C)
attachment relationships into secure (B) child - parent
attachment relationships.2 In a few programs, the intervention is not only directed at sensitive parental behaviour but also at maternal mental
attachment representations, as in the STEEP (Steps Toward Effective Enjoyable Parenting) program described by Egeland.
Here, the work of Main comes to the fore: the Adult
Attachment Interview7 enables coders to distinguish reliably between parents with insecure (dismissing, preoccupied or unresolved) states of mind and parents with secure (autonomous) attachment repres
Attachment Interview7 enables coders to distinguish reliably between parents with
insecure (dismissing, preoccupied or unresolved) states of mind and parents with secure (autonomous)
attachment repres
attachment representations.
Beyond romance, the security of mothers» internal working models of
attachment has been used to predict the secure or
insecure category of the infant
attachment formed by the mothers with their own infants.37 Research has found that parents with
insecure models recall their own parents less well than other parents38, which may indicate a lack of any coherent mental
representation of good parenting.
Maltreated infants randomized to the community standard condition continued to evidence extremely high rates of
insecure attachment consistent with that present at baseline.9 Interestingly, in the latter preventive intervention, a didactic and more behaviourally focused intervention was just as effective as one dealing with maternal
representations in promoting secure
attachment.
Attachment representations were coded as secure, organized
insecure and disorganized categories.
The intervention successfully decreased externalizing behavior problems in preschoolers in a high risk sample with an overrepresentation of
insecure adult
attachment representations (Klein Velderman et al. 2006a, b).