Not exact matches
I mean, all you wanted to do was come in, offer several terribly unflattering
insinuations about everyone who has been commenting negatively
regarding Tony Jones (most especially Julie), disguise them as high - minded concern for truth and justice, and get out no worse for wear.
What those ancient Greeks (who also had some understanding of philosophy)
regarded as a task for a whole lifetime, seeing that dexterity in doubting is not acquired in a few days or weeks, what the veteran combatant attained when he had preserved the equilibrium of doubt through all the pitfalls he encountered, who intrepidly denied the certainty of sense - perception and the certainty of the processes of thought, incorruptibly defied the apprehensions of self - love and the
insinuations of sympathy — that is where everybody begins in our time.
This undertaking is risky in a twofold
regard: It requires the development and introduction of new
insinuations about reality, which have not yet to any extent been made plausible by the uneasiness about the obsolete symbolizations of actuality; and unfathomable problems in theoretical technique arise, so that, in addition to the impression that the «foundations» to be reintroduced and the new cognitions to be introduced are misleading, one becomes conscious of dilettantism in the intellectual treatment of such problems.
It's not your opinions
regarding others» modus operandi that I take issue with you fool; it's the way you attack their persons by way of sly negative
insinuation (every one of them) while so doing.