Between 2000 and 2010 — under a looming urgency to secure energy supplies posed by the Schröder nuclear phaseout — the share of renewables in Germany's power profile soared from 6.4 % (37 TWh) to 17 % (103 TWh), and
installed nameplate capacities surged by almost 500 %, from 12 GW to 56 GW.
Not exact matches
The
installed (
nameplate)
capacity and generation amounts do not reflect contracted
capacity and generational requirements as measured under California's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS).
By
installing a large PV solar
nameplate capacity, using the need to pay off this (subsidized) investment as the rationale for approved rate increases, and then selling us (mostly) the cheaper electricity they make from coal and uranium, they actually increase the profitability of coal and uranium more than PV solar.
... Grantee shall pay Owner a minimum royalty (the «Minimum Royalty») equal to the greater of (I) the dollar amount per
nameplate rated Megawatt
Capacity or (2) the dollar amount per WTG
Installed on the Premises based on the minimum dollar amount per year, as set forth in the table below.
Taking
capacity factors into account, the actual electricity output generated compared to the
nameplate installed capacity is shown below by country.