Let's begin with the authors» using 13 «dimensions of teaching expertise» as their evaluation criteria
instead of student test scores.
Not exact matches
Some real - life changes, however, are being made in a number
of schools around the country that focus on the critical - thinking skills
of one
student at a time
instead of the collective
test scores of a class, or a whole school, or a state.
Under his reform plan, Mr. Cuomo is suggesting that 50 percent
of teacher assessments be based on
student test scores instead of the current 20 percent.
In this case, failing means
student test scores are in the bottom 5 percent,
test scores are getting worse
instead of better, or the schools» graduation rates are below 60 percent for three consecutive years.
Instead, despite an influx
of novice teachers,
student math and English
test scores either stayed the same or went up.
«
Instead of relying on intellect to produce good grades and high
test scores,» Gauld writes in Character First: The Hyde School Difference, «
students at Hyde learn to follow the dictates
of their conscience so they can develop the character necessary to bring out their unique potential.»
Instead of digging into that,
of course, Winerip jumps to the predictable conclusion that «evaluating teachers based on their
students test scores may not be foolproof.»
Instead of using proficiency rates to gauge achievement, Colorado will take an average
of students»
test scores, which sounds simple (like blocking and tackling) because it is simple — assuming you do it.
Instead, school districts, eager to be perceived as plugged in and afraid
of being penalized for low
test scores, have bought into expensive drill - and - kill software — the kind that costs a fortune and displays a silly animation
of fireworks or cheering crowds for every five correct answers — with only minimal improvements on
test scores and scant evidence
of long - term progress among
students.
Instead of multiple indicators
of what
students know, we end up with a single
test score that somehow is supposed to capture everything that's inside
of a
student's head.»
Expand: Comprehensive Assessment Assessment should be expanded beyond simple
test scores to
instead provide a detailed, continuous profile
of student strengths and weaknesses.
Many Obama supporters thought he would de-emphasize
test scores, but
instead his administration made them even more important for «accountability» purposes, and teachers found themselves in the crosshairs
of unreasonable evaluation systems, sometimes being assessed by the
scores of students they didn't have and / or subjects they didn't teach.
So, portfolios are frequently included with other types
of authentic assessments because they move away from telling a
student's story though
test scores and,
instead, focus on a meaningful collection
of student performance and meaningful reflection and evaluation
of that work.
It emphasizes high - stakes
testing, judging teachers by their
students»
test scores, closing low - performing schools
instead of helping them improve, and promoting a huge increase in private management
of public schools.
Concerning the so - called «achievement gap», why don't we create a
test that is biased in favor
of urban populations
instead of one biased against them, and see how suburban
students score.
Episode Info:
Instead of just looking at the effect teachers have on the
test scores of their
students, researchers have expanded their focus to include the impact
of teachers on
student attendance and the long run outcomes
of their
students.
Instead of simply relying on
test scores, teams will explore other, more holistic measures that include
student ownership and agency, social and emotional support, and career preparedness.
In a departure from the past decade's heavy reliance on
test scores to determine which
students advance to the next grade, the New York City Department
of Education said Wednesday that schools will use a basket
of measures
instead.
That being not enough, he then decreed that states could apply for flexibility waivers to get out
of the terrible mandates
of NCLB as long as they agreed to the terrible mandates
of Arne Duncan: to adopt the Common Core state standards, the common core national
tests, link teacher and principal evaluations to standardized
test scores, and,
instead of all
students being «proficient» by 2014, assure that all
students will be «college ready» by 2020.
Instead of relying on intelligence and achievement
test scores solely for identification, multiple criteria would be used, including more non-traditional measures such as observing
students interacting with a variety
of learning opportunities (Passow & Frasier, 1996) it is a belief
of many in the field
of gifted education that new conceptions
of giftedness and a new paradigm for identifying and selecting
students will help minority and disadvantaged
students become more represented in gifted programs (VanTassel - Baska, Patton, & Prillaman, 1991; Ford, 1996).
Instead of paying teachers based on seniority, North Carolina is experimenting with alternative models — such as paying teachers more based on
student test scores or for agreeing to accept additional duties or leadership roles.
We could increase charter school
test scores by opening more charter schools that targeted suburban white
students instead of at - risk urban youth, but that's not the point
of having charter schools.
Instead, North Carolina will institute a system
of merit pay based on
students»
test scores.
This detailed information about
student academic growth should be used
instead of AGT
scores or any other measurements based on a single
test, as teachers and administrators seek to use data to inform best practices that will improve
student achievement;» [emphasis ours]
Instead, 50 %
of the
score will be based on
student growth on state
tests, or a
student growth measure that measures one year
of academic growth.
The project leaders and the evaluators often don't consider the quality
of project implementation and,
instead, look only at
student scores on state
tests.
Instead of test scores, Dr. Cobb suggests that we should have looked at other variables, such as
student success in extracurricular activities and graduation rates.
Using multiple measures,
instead of just
test scores, to determine an education endeavor's success can lead to enhanced
student performance, better decision making, and a more comprehensive view
of school quality and
student achievement.
Instead of recognizing the impact poverty and language barriers actually have on educational outcomes, the «education reformers» claimed that if we just hold teachers accountable,
test scores will go up and
students will succeed.
«Another unanswered question is why we aren't investing education resources in community schools that will educate all children,
instead of cherry - picking
students to boost standardized
test scores.
The results speak for themselves: Our
students are community assets,
instead of tax liabilities; academic
test scores are improving;
students spend more time actively learning; discipline problems have significantly reduced; and we cut
students» average stay in half, while doubling the number
of students who return to their home schools.
Depending on which reform strategy wins, new changes may also be introduced that mandate the grading
of teachers based on
students»
test scores instead of experience.
By excluding the use
of student scores on statewide mastery examinations in teacher evaluations curriculum emphasis can return to a well - rounded experience
instead of the narrow focus
of artificial achievement in the form
of test preparation.
The legislation «evolved» with hard work by AEA from an original mandate that 50 percent
of a teacher's evaluation be based upon
student test scores,
Instead, the key features
of the new bill include what AEA called «a statewide uniform system
of teacher evaluation (beginning in the 2014 - 15 school year) that emphasizes quality assurance and teacher growth»....
Instead of judging schools based on a snapshot
of a single year's
test scores, we compared results during a four - year period, looking for trends in
student achievement.
In 2005, the district adopted universal screening
instead of using a referral program; all second - grade
students took an ability
test, and those who
scored above a given threshold took an IQ
test in order to qualify for a gifted - and - talented program.
Instead of focusing on
test scores, many respondents said that counselors should be able to focus on helping individual
students explore career paths and develop individual plans
of study.
Obama's — and the Education Department's — claim that NCLB will diminish teaching to the
test because it will allow states to develop their own school accountability systems that measure
students» growth,
instead of the raw proficiency
scores.
While the state is moving toward a more robust and comprehensive accountability system
instead of relying mostly on
student test scores, CORE says its breakdown uses more parameters to measure a school's performance.