Sentences with phrase «instructed on behalf of the defendant»

Domansa and others v Derin Shipping [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 362: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant shipowners in this claim arising out of the death in service of three crew members.

The «Tychy» [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 11; The «Tychy No 2» [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 403: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendants in this dispute arising out of a slot charterparty operated under the TACA conference agreement.

A v B: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant sellers in this dispute arising out of the sale of a Ro - Ro car ferry which suffered major engine damage shortly after delivery.

Stapleton v Howard Kennedy: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant solicitors in this claim which came on for trial after the Claimant's appeal against summary judgment entered for the Defendants was allowed.

Sappi Paper Holding - v - Gearbulk AG: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendants in this Commercial Court action in which the Claimants claimed damages for losses suffered as a result of a fire on board his client's vessel.

London & Regional v Lawrence Graham: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant solicitors in this professional negligence claim relating to a proposed joint venture agreement.

Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited — v - Halliwells: Chris is instructed on behalf of the Defendant solicitors in relation to appeals and cross appeals to be heard against the first instance judgment which allowed some heads of claim but not others.

TVR v C: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant, a leading International Law Firm, in relation to this matter.

D — v - D: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant solicitors in relation to two claims arising out of failed real estate transactions in Dubai.

St. Nicholas Trading Company v Tarquin Boat Company: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant in this long running commercial dispute arising out of a Distribution Agreement entered into between the parties for the distribution of luxury motor yachts.

Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant in this claim for repayment of monies advanced for the purchase of a high speed ferry.

Ssangyong Motor Distributors v Daewoo: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendants in this matter in which the High Court stayed English proceedings to await the outcome of a Korean arbitration.

Michael Gerson Investments v Haines Watts [2002] Lloyd's P.N. 493: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Defendant solicitors in this professional negligence claim involving 9 claims arising out of a failed tax avoidance scheme.

Not exact matches

Gladman Commercial Properties v Fisher Hargreaves Proctor [2013] EWCA Civ 1466: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Third Defendant in this # 30m + claim which concerned the attempted sale of a plot of land for development as managed student accommodation.

The «Pisti»: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Claimants in relation to this collision claim in the Admiralty Court concerning the question of whether the Defendant vessel had passed too fast and too close to the Claimant's vessel which was alongside at the time.

Sun Cross v Rickmers Genoa [2010] EWHC 1949 (Admlty): Chris was instructed on behalf of the Owners of the Defendant vessel in this collision action.

Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor B.V. v Bank of China [2015] EWHC 999 (Comm): Chris was instructed on behalf of the Claimant in this action in which his clients claimed payment under 2 guarantees provided by the Defendant.

Janet is a defendant health litigation lawyer, instructed on behalf of NHS trusts, insurers and private clinicians to represent them in clinical negligence claims.

In clinical negligence claims he was usually instructed on behalf of the Claimant but in personal injury claims arising from industrial accidents or road traffic accidents he was instructed by both Claimants and Defendants.

Instructed by Appleby on behalf of the 3rd Defendant.