It is completely subjective and is simply used as
an insult against religions.
It is the prosecution's view that the circumstances surrounding the burning of holy books like the Bible and the Qur «an imply that it may in some cases be a violation of the blasphemy provision, which deals with public mockery or
insult against a religion.
Not exact matches
The judge was clearly prejudice
against the athiest for
insulting religion and made up his mind not to give a fair verdict.
The word was actually first used as an
insult against anyone in conflict with the established
religion.
Atheist don't wan't the catholic church scorning /
insulting them and they will try to use the law to prevent them however they want to attack the catholic church which is
against the bill or fights in freedom of
religion to do so publicily.