Sentences with phrase «insured vehicle is driven»

Damages are not covered by a two wheeler insurance policy provided by National Insurance Company Limited if the insured vehicle is driven outside of India.

Can the car insurance company legally deny insuring the vehicle she is driving in this kind of case?

Under the no - fault system in Kentucky the driver of the automobile and the passengers will register a claim with the auto insurance corporation that insures the vehicle they were driving.

Not exact matches

In the eyes of insurers, today's self - driving vehicles are treated no differently than conventional cars when they're involved in a collision, according to Maureen Brown of Munich Reinsurance America, a firm that insures a number of companies testing autonomous vehicles.

While virtually all vehicles are now privately insured this ratio is likely to drop massively in the future as self - drive cars replace privately owned ones in the urban areas.

I was a little reluctant to follow through as I have never bought a vehicle online before but Sal insured... me that once we got there I wouldn??? t be disappointed we proceeded to drive from RI to the dealership Once there we were speechless the truck was more then we expected.Sal was great to deal with and Luis made the paper work Seamless.the manger was great too.

Each vehicle has been through a detailed inspection by our auto mechanics to insure we only stock pre-owned cars of the highest quality to make your used vehicle driving experience hassle free.

Rates often vary according other factors including a driver's age, driving history, how the insured vehicle is used and where the driver lives.

In some cases, states require that these vehicles are insured in order to be legally driven, so we recommend referring to your local laws and considering coverage to protect your vehicle — whether it's required or not.

A type of auto insurance coverage that helps protect an insured in the event they are involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by someone without liability insurance.

There are also opportunities to save by insuring multiple vehicles, driving a car with air bags, always wearing seat belts and taking advantage of various other discounts.

In other words, you must be insured to drive the vehicle you'll use for Uber, but you don't need to have the vehicle registered in your name.

Your quotes will ultimately depend on circumstances specific to you, such as what vehicle you drive, whether you've had any accidents or moving violations in the past five years, and what liability coverage limits you choose to be insured for.

Instead of insuring the driver for any car in which they are driving, Autonational instead covers a named vehicle, meaning whomever is driving the car, legally, when assistance is required, is instead covered under that policy.

Obviously car insurance will cover you to drive your own vehicle (you have insured) but some comprehensive policies insure you (not the named drivers)-- if you're driving the cars of your friends and family — with their permission of course.

Car insurance will also not cover damage that occurred when a person who lives with you but is not insured under your policy drives your vehicle.

The different add - ons that are available will depend greatly on your driving record, age, location and the vehicle that you are insuring.

Part of the journey to or from the Cape can be driven along Ninety Mile Beach (which is actually 88 kilometres long), though this is not recommended unless visitors have suitable vehicles - cars are typically not insured if driven along Ninety Mile Beach.

The plaintiff was injured when the automobile he was driving was hit head - on by a vehicle driven a driver insured by State Farm.

The vehicle responsible was driven by a Mr Pereira and it was insured with Fidelidade - Companhia de Seguros (Fidelidade), a Portuguese insurer.

(2) Clause (1)(c) does not prevent an excluded driver or any other occupant of an automobile driven by the excluded driver from recovering accident benefits under a motor vehicle liability policy in respect of which the excluded driver or other occupant is a named insured.

Coverage is available under your policy for everyone in your household who is driving or riding in a vehicle insured in British Columbia, or if they are injured as a pedestrian or cyclist.

Bruinsma v. Cresswell et al. 2013 ONCA 111 Insurance — Automobile insurance — Compulsory government schemes — Uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage — Exceptions and exclusions A disqualified driver (plaintiff) was in an accident while driving his girlfriend's vehicle (insured by CAA).

If the plaintiff is not a named insured, state the reason why this person is considered an insured under the policy (for example, a «dependent relative» under the OPCF 44R or a person who had consent to drive the vehicle involved in the motor vehicle accident)-- it is important to note that an insurance contract is between two parties.

By: Shaun Fluker PDF Version: Statutory Interpretation and the Traffic Safety Act Case Commented On: R v Kirollos, 2015 ABQB 474 Anyone who drives a vehicle in Alberta knows the law requires the vehicle be registered and insured.

(3) Clause (2)(b) does not prevent an excluded driver or any other occupant of an automobile driven by the excluded driver from recovering accident benefits under a motor vehicle liability policy in respect of which the excluded driver or other occupant is a named insured.

In general, it is an endorsement added to an insurance policy stating that a specifically named individual with access to your insured vehicle will NOT be covered by the insurance provider to drive the insured vehicle.

This ICBC claimant was involved in a motor vehicle accident while driving a vehicle which was insured by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, ICBC.

If at the time of an accident the excluded driver is a passenger in a vehicle that she is excluded from driving, she could still claim recourse against that insurer as an «insured person» because she was an occupant of the vehicle involved in the accident (criteria (b) in the «insured person» definition».

The question was whether he was specified in the policy as a driver of the insured automobile by virtue of being listed on the Certificate as one of the drivers on the policy, notwithstanding being excluded from driving any of the vehicles on the same policy.

However, other parts of the Certificate identified him as being excluded from driving both of the described vehicles that were insured under the same policy.

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cVehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

In 1975, for example, the province's regulations defined an insured person as «a [licensed] driver... who operates or drives... with consent»; in 1984, the licensing requirement was dropped and the definition was broadened as «an individual who with... consent... operates the vehicle»; and in 2001, the definition was broadened further as «an individual who with consent... uses or operates the vehicle.»

[54] Given the intention of parties to this type of insurance coverage, which is to compensate the insured person injured as a result of an incident involving an unidentified automobile, it seems unreasonable to enforce a term of the contract that demands physical contact between the insured motor vehicle and the unidentified automobile, notwithstanding the existence of physical evidence corroborating the fact that the relevant incident occurred as a result of the insured's defensive driving action directed at avoiding physical contact with another vehicle.

The DAS benefits included the provision of a replacement vehicle at no cost to the insured in the event of accident caused solely by another identified and insured driver if the insured's own vehicle could not be driven.

Regardless of whether you are driving every day or every month, you need to insure for vehicle with liability coverage.

To enter the Sunshine State by car and legally drive within the state's limits, the vehicle must be insured.

The price of the auto collision insurance is also influenced by a long list of factors including the insured party's driving record, type and age of the vehicle, and where they live and keep the vehicle.

The Alaska DMV publishes an annual list of areas without insurance requirements — but be warned, it changes: For instance, Alaska decided that in 2012, vehicles, snowmachines and ATVs driven on Kotzebue's public roads must now be insured.

Because auto insurance brokers write policies for multiple insurance companies, they are usually aware of which companies offer the best coverage options and lowest premium rates for a particular type of car insurance policy — based on the type of vehicle to be insured, your age and gender and your own personal driving record.

Section 941 of the Oklahoma Insurance Code says that a company can not assign driving record points, cancel, refuse to renew or increase the premium rate for any motor vehicle liability or collision insurance policy for the reason that the insured has been involved in a motor vehicle collision and was not at fault.

Whether it's bundling auto and home policies together, insuring a second vehicle, or driving accident and violation free, Plymouth Rock can help determine which individual discounts apply to you.

It specifically deals with accidents that occur while the insured person is driving, and applies to the insured person's vehicle.

In every other case, when the insurance carrier finds that the insured is breaching the terms of the policy like driving the vehicle for purposes other than for personal use (i.e. delivery, newspaper route, or for business), the insurance company will not renew the policy, but coverage will remain in effect until the end of the policy period.

It allows more lower - income households to insure a vehicle, and makes it more cost effective for households of any income class to insure an extra vehicle that is seldom driven, such as an old truck used for errands or a recreational vehicle.

Sport cars, SUVs and four - wheel drive vehicles are among the most expensive to insure.

Therefore, should you opt for the least expensive type of auto insurance, liability coverage, you may only be fully covered when you are driving your insured vehicle.

With the named insured or resident spouse's permission, those who drive an insured vehicle will be covered by the owner's policy (subject to applicable limits, conditions and policy exclusions).

Liability will protect you in case someone claims that you (or a person driving your insured vehicles) are responsible for bodily injury or property damage.

Some insurance companies limit the occasional driver to operating the vehicle no more than once a week and, therefore, often he can be insured to drive the vehicle at a lower insurance rate.