Sentences with phrase «insurers under the disputed»

Arbitrations involving claims between boiler and machinery and property insurers under the Disputed Loss Agreement

Not exact matches

representing insurers in an arbitration under the auspices of the Singapore International Arbitration (SIAC) against a Netherlands Corporation in a dispute relating to subsea operations and marine infrastructure

9.1 (1) In this section, «settlement» means an agreement between an insurer and in insured person that finally disposes of a claim or dispute in respect of the insured person's entitlement to one or more benefits under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.

Under the previous system, there was no cost to the accident victim to dispute an insurer's denial of a claim.

Declaratory judgment action included claims against insurer for alleged violation of consumer protection law, in addition to dispute over the insurer's reasons for denying coverage for the stock option backdating claims under applicable policy definitions and exclusions.

Arbitrated coverage dispute for an insurer on the availability of uninsured - motorist benefits in a death case under Maryland's «reduction» system of uninsured - motorist coverage.

(5) Despite subsection (1), if there is a dispute about whether subsection (1) applies to a person, the insurer shall pay full benefits to the person under this Regulation pending resolution of the dispute if,

(4) If a person who would be entitled to benefits under this Regulation in the absence of subsection (1) elects to bring an action referred to in section 30 of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 and there is a dispute concerning the insurer's liability to pay an expense for a vocational rehabilitation program the person was attending at the time of the election and continues to attend, the insurer shall pay the expense pending resolution of the dispute.

10.4 governing the procedure for determining who is liable to pay statutory accident benefits under section 268, including requiring insurers to resolve disputes about liability through an arbitration process established by the regulations and requiring the interim payment of benefits pending the determination of liability;

(3) In setting an assessment under subsection (1), the Lieutenant Governor in Council shall take into account the fees received from insurers and insured persons in respect of disputes described in subsection 280 (1).

(a) the insured person may bring a proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction; (b) the insured person may refer the issues in dispute to an arbitrator under section 282; or (c) the insurer and the insured person may agree to submit any issue in dispute to any person for arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration Act, 1991.

Members of Robinson + Cole's Insurance and Reinsurance Group regularly advise insurers on coverage obligations and represent insurers in the litigation or appeal of disputes arising under various forms of liability insurance.

(10) An assessment or examination under this section shall be used only for the purposes of assisting in the resolution of a dispute described in subsection 280 (1) of the Act and the insurer is not required as a result of receiving the report of the assessment or examination to allow any application or pay any benefit that it otherwise would not have allowed or paid.

Among the excess insurance matters we have handled are disputes involving allocation, drop down, exhaustion, the application of aggregate limits, the insolvency of primary insurers and insureds providing primary coverage under a self - insured retention, and the interpretation of «following form» and «other insurance» provisions.

If an insurer refuses to pay a benefit under this Regulation or reduces the amount of a benefit that a person is receiving under this Regulation, the insurer shall provide the person with a written notice concerning the person's right to dispute.

She specialises in insurance litigation, advising London market insurers on coverage, with a particular focus on claims arising under directors» and officers» liability policies, and has experience of cross-border binder and Part VII transfer disputes.

The issue in dispute relates to the insurer's denial of liability to pay an amount under an invoice on the grounds that,

(9) Clause (2)(a) shall not be interpreted as prohibiting an additional examination of the applicant under oath, under Ontario Regulation 283/95 (Disputes Between Insurers) made under the Act, at the insurer's request that is conducted for the purpose of determining who is liable under section 268 of the Act to pay statutory accident benefits in respect of the accident.

His third - party experience includes advising and defending insurers in disputes with insureds on claims made under comprehensive general liability, directors and officers (D&O), professional liability, and specialty policies.

Section 4 requires the insurer giving notice under section 3 to also give the claimant a Notice to Applicant of Dispute Between Insurers form, which is a prescribed document that advises the claimant of the dispute and the name or names of the other insurer (s) who might have priority over the Dispute Between Insurers form, which is a prescribed document that advises the claimant of the dispute and the name or names of the other insurer (s) who might have priority over the dispute and the name or names of the other insurer (s) who might have priority over the claims.

Acting for a major construction company on a number of # multi-million coverage disputes with London market insurers under its liability and all risks insurance.

Mr. Herman is a seasoned lawyer who has spent much of his legal career representing large health insurers, plan administrators, and self - funded health plans in managed care disputes, often arising under the provisions of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Her practice principally involves representing insurers in complex insurance disputes on a broad range of issues arising under primary and excess policies and reinsurance coverages, with particular emphasis on general liability coverage claims involving environmental and other long - tail liabilities, personal and advertising injury coverage and errors and omissions insurance and the «bad faith» issues arising from such disputes.

Section 275 (4) of the Act requires insurers to refer any unresolved priority dispute to arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 17.

That sub-section stated that «If the insurers are unable to agree with respect to indemnification under this section, the dispute shall be resolved through arbitration under the Arbitration Act.»