Not exact matches
The emerging struggles produced within American Protestantism two basic parties: the fundamentalists, who were committed to the defense
of the shape
of classic Protestantism and feared that any accommodation to these new currents
of thought meant the demise
of Christianity; and the modernists, who felt that
intellectual integrity required some form
of adaptation and rethinking
of classical
modes of articulating Christian faith.
But Orrin Klapp had earlier observed that «mockery
of heroes is not only a literary
mode — an amusement for satirists and tired
intellectuals — but has entered popular
thought and is an important feature
of American society» (p. 167).
Although he does not speak specifically
of prototaxic, parataxic, and syntaxic
modes of experience, the same sequential patterns are reflected in his description
of the first cycle
of intellectual progress, which runs «from the achievement
of perception to the acquirement
of language, and from the acquirement
of language to classified
thought and keener perception» (AE 31).
In
Modes of Thought, Whitehead praised William James for the character
of his
intellectual life, which was «one protest against the dismissal
of experience in the interest
of system» (MT 4).
The dominant style
of modern
thought has been contestation
of all traditions, and it was largely the Catholic
intellectual community's belated reception
of that
mode of operation which led it to declare irrelevant its own richest flowering.
Again in
Modes of Thought, Whitehead accords «importance» a central role in the
intellectual search for worth and civilization.
One
of the genuine alternatives in our time to the «dialectical» or «Continental» theology as a constructive advance upon liberalism is the
mode of theological
thinking which seeks to reinterpret the force and meaning
of the Christian faith within the new
intellectual framework that is being provided by modern metaphysics.
My art touches people who are in tune with my
mode of thinking, but it is clear that people can not understand my art by
intellectual processes alone because no art can be experienced in that way.