that is
the intellectual understanding of faith.
Not exact matches
Guiding Principles Religious and theological studies depend on and reinforce each other; A principled approach to religious values and
faith demands the
intellectual rigor and openness
of quality academic work; A well - educated student
of religion must have a deep and broad
understanding of more than a single religious tradition; Studying religion requires that one
understand one's own historical context as well as that
of those whom one studies; An exemplary scholarly and teaching community requires respect for and critical engagement with difference and diversity
of all kinds.
By pressing the ancient moral criterion
of equity while refusing to discuss the economic criterion
of growth, the clergy in effect revived a medieval
understanding of faith as
intellectual sacrifice.
The
Faith movement has this principle at the heart of its approach to the formation of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding of the created univ
Faith movement has this principle at the heart
of its approach to the formation
of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the
faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding of the created univ
faith, just as in the natural sciences, and to develop such
intellectual curiosity within a theological framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our
understanding of the created universe.
If there is to be active commitment, then there must be some degree
of intellectual understanding of what the
faith involves, and this in turn means that the
faith is expressed in certain practices and doctrines.
They recognized and analyzed the social,
intellectual, and emotional role
of faith and the Church in shaping crusaders» mentalities, creating a more rounded
understanding of motive, incentive, and cultural context.
For like Whitehead and Dewey, Kadushin
understood that the concept
of organic thinking offered an approach to logic and the foundations
of knowledge that was an alternative to the perversions
of the sort
of blind
faith in natural science that had come to dominate the
intellectual cultures
of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; an alternative that did not attempt to devalue science or replace it with a nonrational mysticism, but which did attempt to place scientific thought into a broader cultural context in which other forms
of cultural expression such as religious and legal reasoning could play important and non-subservient roles.
These must be the basis
of continued growth in
understanding the meaning
of the Christian
faith, in finding God's power in one's life, and in that self - commitment in action from which
intellectual debates can be an escape.
The relation
of love to the intellect proceeds from three assumption: first, that
faith transcends rational categories through God's self - revelation in Christ; second, that
intellectual understanding is necessary for the guidance
of human life; and third, that both seek the same object in God's being and His revealed truth — namely, that it is through agape with its consequent repentance, humility, and
understanding of human limits that the intellect can appropriately function.
Inculturation should not be
understood merely as
intellectual research; it occurs when Christians express their
faith in the symbols and images
of their respective culture.
As expressed in the preface to his Foundations
of Christian
Faith, his theological intention was «to reach a renewed
understanding of this message and to arrive at an «idea»
of Christianity... and... try as far as possible to situate Christianity within the
intellectual horizon
of people today.
Where theology has been conceived as an
intellectual activity, method served to build up a system
of explanation for the
understanding of faith — fides quaerens intellectum.
It does mean that the books
of the Old Covenant are studied in the context
of an
intellectual love
of God and neighbor,
of a
faith that seeks
understanding.
Rabbi Gellman's idea
of the «Judaectomy» that many Jews feel they must perform on themselves in order to participate in civic discourse rang true (mutatis mutandis) for these young Catholics, who
understand that a certain unwritten code
of etiquette requires them to check their
faith at the door in order to be heard as
intellectuals.
In this Biffi depicted Anselm's perspective as, contrary to much modern emphasis, grasping that «reality as a whole is much greater than we grasp through simple natural
understanding, substantiated solely by sensory experience, inductive and deductive reasoning, mathematical calculation -LSB-...]
faith not only is not separable from reason, and does not harm it, but is even the greatest and highest exercise
of our
intellectual faculty.»
As
intellectual center
of the Church's life it is the place where in specific manner
faith seeks
understanding.
(4) for someone who (like me) generally respects your opinion and uses your technical expertise as a touchstone for evaluating technical questions they are incapable
of understanding (either by way
of insufficient background or
intellectual limitations — or both, as in my case), you undermine your own credibility by accusing someone who at least seems to be engaging in good
faith,
of engaging in bad
faith.
Because the goal is for the candidate to live the
faith (not merely have an
intellectual understanding of it) and is more likely to achieve this praxis when the candidate becomes self motivated as a consequence
of the relationship with the sponsor... i.e. «I can do this because my sponsor has made it clear to me that he / she is enough like me that I now know I can also live the (
faith) tradition as effectively as he / she does.