Sentences with phrase «intellectually dishonest»

To back up his point, he stated that «Many people in the business community are «intellectually dishonest,» and while they preach diversity, they don't practice it.»
Raising the access - to - justice flag is intellectually dishonest, however.
Pooka, are you claiming that judicial nominations were always partisan donnybrooks with intellectually dishonest campaign commercials being run on both sides?
had there been a defence lawyer rules say they cant hide case law they know about -LCB- they would discover more if defending -RCB- in hope that we don't discover it = unethical.type in» stare decisis and techniques of legal reasoning» Which also says it is unethical and intellectually dishonest for a judge to ignore case law that stands in the way of his decision = the defence wont give case law and the judge wont do defence lawyer research - so case law / evidence will not be heard and will not be there for a SRL to use / defend our case.
He stated that the proposal should be rejected out of hand, in part because the Commission had taken an «intellectually dishonest approach, hoping we would not notice the real purpose of the Regulatory Objectives is to be a stalking horse for non-lawyers practicing law, non-lawyers owning law firms and multi-disciplinary practices.»
They are being intellectually dishonest.
You have demonstrated, clearly, you are intellectually dishonest.
As a non-scientist I can't independently judge who's right on the data; but as a lawyer I know a half - baked argument when I see one, and the intellectually dishonest way that Fox presents this issue while ignoring or mischaracterizing contrary evidence gives me pause.
«Intellectually dishonest» though, yes.
What busy working scientists want to avoid ending up doing is hand - holding morons, and additional demotivation is if the morons are of the delusionally paranoid, intellectually dishonest kind.
You're an idiot webster — and a liar, intellectually dishonest, ignorant and a fool.
Hiding the decline (Mike's Nature Trick)-- I understand the reason why the proxies have to be related to the instrumental record... But substituting the instrumental record for a proxy - derived temperature chronology is intellectually dishonest.
I'm kinda moving from thinking them tendentious and biased and intellectually dishonest, to now questioning their basic level of thoughtfulness.
Your dodging and weaving, and cherry picking of irrelevancies to avoid admitting your are wrong is intellectually dishonest.
But none of this is to say that Cox understands his position is political, though it is doubtlessly intellectually dishonest.
However, I've spent enough time checking both sides, with an open mind, to convince myself that the skeptics are intellectually dishonest.
It is intellectually dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future climate impacts.
It is intellectually dishonest of you to pretend something does not exist when the best scientific evidence shows that it exist.
Also, it seems intellectually dishonest to advocate a carbon tax when the public is learning that the global warming advocates grossly exaggerated the effect of carbon dioxide on the climate and satellite data show no global warming for the past eighteen years.
The current crusade involves trying to intimidate dissenting scientists and writers out of the public square by accusing them of being intellectually dishonest henchpersons working for Big Oil.
Well, it is here and it is just another tool of an arrogant, power hungry, intellectually dishonest elite.
A scientist at Georgia Tech is the latest target of the current crusade trying to intimidate dissenting scientists and writers out of the public square by accusing them of being intellectually dishonest henchpersons working for Big Oil.
But as ridiculous as these examples are, it is this same wafer - thin and intellectually dishonest debating trick that has been deployed by Australian prime minister, Tony Abbott, and his environment minister, Greg Hunt, in recent days to dismiss the link between human - caused climate change and bushfires.
And in the larger picture, it's intellectually dishonest for advocates of socializing electric utilities to promote the euphemistic «decoupling» as if it were some novel solution rather than what it really is — a subversion of our capitalistic system.
IPCC statements and conclusions are dismissed as being entirely meaningless, logically flawed, totally absurd, intellectually dishonest, and in violation of scientific norms.
Thus climatologists can not possibly be the only authorities on the science behind climate... it would be intellectually dishonest to claim otherwise and a disservice to the other science disciplines and its experts involved to make it a whole.
I think he has contributed more to public misunderstanding of the global warming issue than any other scientist and believe his work to be shoddy and intellectually dishonest.
Ignoring [partial] defeat or See Sign # 1 An intellectually dishonest speaker / writer will NEVER admit that the other side has found a hole in their argument.
This is different from my saying that you must agree that you are intellectually dishonest.
I remember wondering, after I interviewed Lomborg, whether he was intellectually dishonest or just not very bright.
Maybe you could clarify, but you appear to be suggesting that I'm intellectually dishonest?
By this you must be saying that you agree with the person who asserted that ignoring a person who has found a hole in your argument is intellectually dishonest.
swood1000, Maybe you could clarify, but you appear to be suggesting that I'm intellectually dishonest?
Moreover I think you are immensely intellectually dishonest.
See: «Academic embarrassment»: Prof. Jon Krosnick Exposed for «faulty» climate polls — «Skewed, propagandized and presented intellectually dishonest and shallow polling analysis»
You're calling me intellectually dishonest based on the notion my clarification «wasn't immediate» because it «was made in another comment.»
All along the «underlying exponential warming curve» was in the back of my mind, but it seemed to me intellectually dishonest to infer it from inadequately described data such as the 162 numbers in the raw HadCRUT3VGL times series, which was just a mess of numbers.
«Failing to distinguish between the consequences of smoking and second hand smoke... is just intellectually dishonest
Climate Depot Response: Arndt's claim is bizarre, misleading and intellectually dishonest.
This morning, Korman repeatedly slammed his hand down on the table for emphasis, interrupting the government counsel's every other sentence with assertions like, «You're just playing games here,» «You're making an intellectually dishonest argument,» «You're basically lying,» «This whole thing is a charade,» «I'm entitled to say this is a lot of nonsense, am I not?»
It seems to me, observing a handful of cherry picked glaciers that are breaking up, as hard evidence to buttress global warning, is intellectually dishonest, despite the research acumen in a relatively new field.
I sure hope this intellectually dishonest style is not how you conduct yourself in your normal academic role.
Pretending that it was is complacent, insular and either intellectually dishonest or genuinely stupid.
It's simply not true, and it's intellectually dishonest.
If you can't admit that the coverage, users and comments here have a Sony slant then you are intellectually dishonest.
Stealing is stealing and folks who dress it up in Robin Hood clothes are either fooling themselves or morally & intellectually dishonest.
Because their argument is morally repulsive, intellectually dishonest, and abhorrent violation of one's obligation to their fellow men and women.
Using CMTs is not only intellectually dishonest but will further divide our students on the basis of poverty, language barriers and the need for special education services.
Evaluating teachers using the results of the Common Core SBAC test is not only intellectually dishonest but morally reprehensible.
While healthcare costs are unsustainable, it is factually incorrect and intellectually dishonest to say that Connecticut's pension system is «unsustainable».
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z