Two former senior US
intelligence officials claim that evidence, if any, of Russian interference in the US elections last year would still be available in NSA databases.
Not exact matches
The timeline of
claims made in an unsubstantiated dossier presented by top US
intelligence officials to President Donald Trump and senior lawmakers last month has increased scrutiny of events that unfolded in the final months of the Trump campaign.
The report, built around detailed chronologies of dozens of CIA detainees, documents a long - standing pattern of unsubstantiated
claims as agency
officials sought permission to use — and later tried to defend — excruciating interrogation methods that yielded little, if any, significant
intelligence, according to U.S.
officials who have reviewed the document.
Because the Steele dossier — a private
intelligence report compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele — included a
claim that Cohen met with a Russian
official in Prague to talk about Russia's interference and advocacy for Trump in the 2016 election.
It was the first to report that U.S.
intelligence officials briefed Trump about
claims that Russia was in possession of compromising information on him, and it broke the story that the White House had asked the F.B.I. to publicly reject media reports that people close to Trump were in contact with the Russians during the campaign.
Guccifer
claimed in a posting on their Wordpress site to have «penetrated Hillary Clinton's and other Democrats» mail servers,» but the self - described hacker was later characterized by U.S.
officials as a front for Russian military
intelligence.
A former State Department
official who served under former President Barack Obama confirmed recent allegations made by Republicans that the author of the infamous «Trump dossier» and an ally of Hillary Clinton gave him
intelligence reports
claiming to show collusion between Trump's campaign and the Russians.
A U.S. counterterrorism
official told NBC News that the
intelligence community is unaware of any
claims of responsibility in the attack at this time.
The hacker
claiming responsibility for the breach — working under the pseudonym Guccifer 2.0, which American
intelligence officials believe is an alias for a Russian
intelligence hacker — appeared eager to taunt Democrats in releasing the latest files.
In April 2009,
officials at the United States Department of Justice acknowledged that the NSA had engaged in large - scale overcollection of domestic communications in excess of the federal
intelligence court's authority, but
claimed that the acts were unintentional and had since been rectified.8
The unverified allegations — including a
claim Russia has material that could be used to blackmail Mr. Trump — were deemed sufficiently significant by senior
intelligence officials... They said sharing of such unverified information was taken out of an abundance of caution...
As the WP points out, this revelation follows a Time report from May
claiming that US
intelligence officials had found proof of politically targeted, Kremlin - affiliated Facebook ad buys during the 2016 Presidential election.