Sentences with phrase «intelligent creator»
The phrase "intelligent creator" refers to a being or entity that has the ability to think, plan, and create in a clever and thoughtful manner. Full definition
One can see a point of origin of the universe with the Big Bang theory and determine that an infinite intelligent creator was the source.
religion.blogs.cnn.com
Here's more logic: Who is more likely to cause cause incalculable complexity to exist, a dumb always existing universe or an always existing intelligent creator?
You are postulating an intelligent creator without any justification whatsoever.
But I do see through science evidence of an intelligent creator.
AtheistSteve «You are postulating an intelligent creator without any justification whatsoever.»
How come it is always christian apologists that claim science points to an intelligent creator and not the scientific community?
This seems to point to an intelligent creator.
Random variation and the survival of the fittest appeared to provide explanations of the emergence of new forms, including the human, on principles that removed the need for an intelligent creator and lawgiver.
In other words, the deep - seated assumption that the universe is the product of an intelligent Creator lay behind the rise of modern science.
The argument of a «First Mover» falls aparts when you consider that explaning the ignition of the universe by an intelligent creator requires the creator to already exist (where did he come from?)
It is the observation of these daily occurrences of beauty and complexity that scream of an intelligent creator.
Whether it is deciding upon an investment, significant purchase, or if the existence of the universe is the result of an intelligent creator, I would subject all inquires to the information available.
No, beauty and complexity do not scream of an intelligent creator.
Further, the Bible names this intelligent Creator Truth ¯ the Truth that is the unifying beauty and energy that moves every entity in time and space (and perhaps, in other worlds).
It is by experiment that, today, many who do not believe in an intelligent Creator encounter the intelligibility that suffuses all things.
A process that selects mutant species only on the basis of their accidentally favorable traits seems incompatible with a beneficent and intelligent creator.
[4] Hence, it is not surprising to read that, in theology in general, «creation has been off the theological agenda» — which is all the more unusual given that «[c] osmologists write books almost every month, it seems, arguing that the form and content of the physical universe display an elegance and delicate balance which suggest that it has an intelligent creator.»
The belief that there is not an intelligent Creator behind the universe is your view.
Others give credit to an intelligent Creator.
Amazed by those that can deny the existence of an intelligent creator in favor of the theory of the «big bang»..
Oh, next time I go to the zoo, I'll say HI to some of your relatives that didn't evolve Mr. Catholic Christian believing in «An evolving creation»; where the principles of biological and social evolution are indeed part of the design of an intelligent creator who is NOT all powerful and not «NICE» in the Human context, but «benevolent» at a cosmic scale.
*** Having said this, I am a catholic christian and I believe in «An evolving creation»; where the principles of biological and social evolution are indeed part of the design of an intelligent creator who is NOT all powerful and not «NICE» in the Human context, but «benevolent» at a cosmic scale.The few parts of the Bible and other holy books that are actually accurate, are more metaphorical to me than literal.
Having said this, I am a catholic christian and I believe in «An evolving creation»; where the principles of biological and social evolution are indeed part of the design of an intelligent creator who is NOT all powerful and not «NICE» in the Human context, but «benevolent» at a cosmic scale.
Instead, they argue that the very nature and origin of the universe point to the existence of an intelligent creator, much like writing in the sand would point Robinson Crusoe to the existence of another person on the island.
Dawkins finally justifies his atheistic position by suggesting that an intelligent Creator God would have to be morecomplex — and therefore more improbable — than the universe He is invoked to explain.
He affirms that whilst the universe is «as one would expect» an «intelligent creator to make it» we don't have the evidence for an incontrovertible proof - as per the title of the latest book of another prominent contributor to the documentary: There Almost Certainly Is A God.
I will only say that I believe in Jesus because I look at the historical evidence and scientific evidence and I believe that it points to an intelligent creator.
People told me their stories — of God, the divine, the power of love, an intelligent creator.
Just look at our bodies, the earth, and the universe to see the real evidence of a higher, powerful and intelligent Creator.
Good stuff that points to an intelligent Creator.
Creationism simply means we believe the universe and life was created by an intelligent creator.
You have to provide some sort of solid proof of that this intelligent creator 1) exists and 2) had a hand in creating life on earth.
For example, imagine if a new discovery in physics (like a secret coherent message from God embedded in the structure of human DNA and other life forms) were to provide evidence of an intelligent creator, this would not actually prove the existence of the omnipotent God.
Probability This article will briefly compare three different design arguments for the existence of God, or an intelligent creator; the probability argument,...
The increasing number of scientific discoveries involving hyper - complex systems, even among the smallest of life forms, point away from the idea of these systems forming by simple «chance» and more toward an intelligent creator.
Probability This article will briefly compare three different design arguments for the existence of God, or an intelligent creator; the probability argument, Paley's argument by analogy and Richard Taylor's argument by example.
According to evolutionary theory, the way something exists in nature is simply a consequence of the constraints imposed by the environment and the organisms resources for adaptation - not some ideal or optimal design imagined by an intelligent creator.