Sentences with phrase «intelligent debate on them»

From this vantage, the projects commissioned provoke intelligent debate on the subject of art in its most expansive poetic definition.

This sort of thing is really big business and will creators a chance to have Gwenpool battle it out against Carnage or the Punisher having an intelligent debate on the Kree Empire with Captain Marvel.

If we don't have an intelligent debate on what exactly constitutes an author, I feel we will be in trouble.

Every intelligent debate on student achievement would be wise to consider factors beyond the control of most teachers and schools.

Then, while professing their profound commitments to improving the schools, the campaigners shove intelligent debate on them aside in favor of anything they think will grab voters.

The Senses of Cinema podcast is a monthly podcast that covers wide - ranging discussion of contemporary cinema, retrospectives on films and filmmakers, and includes lively, intelligent debate on the world of cinema and screen.

In fact, the diversity of protein and fats from animal products was what powered our brain's expansion, without it we would have never had the ability to have an intelligent debate on FAT in the first place.

Over the holiday period there was a lively and intelligent debate on the internet about whether the Tories have any chance of winning the next election.

My twitter feed is reserved for adults who want to have intelligent debates on merit, not children,» he wrote March 15.

Not exact matches

In May of this year, Ezra Klien, who is remarkably informed and intelligent on the topic of healthcare, was kind enough to include me on his podcast to discuss and debate my learnings.

furthermore, that ignores a very broad field of scholarship which often speaks to the contrary (again, exposing the fact that there are very intelligent people on BOTH sides of the biblical debate here).

I learned in seminary that there will always be people more intelligent than me on both sides of that debate.

Every proposition of the system could be laid on the table and debated up or down by any intelligent man or woman.

Know anyone intelligent enough to debate on her level?

I mean this site / thread probably isn't the place (understatement) but I have delved into this argument more thn the averge joe, and I guarantee someone taking the opposing position in a debate against me on this subject is going to have their hands full with the amount of evidence I could put forth on them for the supposition that an intelligent enity at the very least kick started this thing off.

Unfortunately rather than focus on reality many followers of the site just want to find any excuse to keep saying Arsene out rather than have intelligent debate.

However once we establish the facts perhaps we can just get on with being supporters, have intelligent debate and get behind the team.

The intelligent biomachine and implications for running Well, it's been a week and a half, and an interruption of our series on Running Shoes thanks to Gebrselassie's announcements, but I have finally managed to get back to the topic that had caused so much debate and discussion: What is the value of running shoes?

It's a topic that's taken on increased interest and debate, thanks to a handful of intelligent voices in social and digital media shining new light.

Yet many supposedly intelligent and reasonable people acted as though they were entering into a real debate on breastfeeding in public spaces, as though it were possible a valid argument might exist against a child's right to be fed.

Overall, judging by the rapturous applause he received, Miliband was in sublime form: dynamic, incisive, intelligent (a man who can quote the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia and apply it to the current foreign policy debate between those who oppose liberal interventionism based on the principle of nation state sovereignty and those who support it based on the natural rights of individuals superseding that sovereignty certainly deserves this accolade) and even at times funny.

«Of course, we need an intelligent debate about the future funding of HE, especially given the current constraints on public finances.

After the debate, I feel the only fully credible candidate on that stage was the Libertarian candidate, Warren Redlich, whose comments were thoughtful, courteous and intelligent, followed by the Green Party candidate, Howie Hawkins whose platform on green growth and development I'm fully in accord with.

A supporter of intelligent design offers an even - handed account of the creation - evolution debates that is focused on the current protagonists rather than the arguments per se.

Dolly touches on obsessions that are already shaping scientific debate in the early 21st century: the dangers of genetic engineering, the conflict between religion and science, and the dim possibility that we will create a race of intelligent robots that will replace us.

We criticize movies on A.I., like last year's release Ex Machina, we debate ethical and moral issues, we challenge them to design and program their own intelligent system.

The debate is usually balanced, always intelligent, and yes, sometimes the characters get a bit preachy, as people do on any controversial issue about which they are passionate.

The breeding industry pays internet trolls to come on to discussions such as this, which are typically full of intelligent debate and respectful, until they show up.

Perhaps they sound more intelligent on those type of policy issues because the topic has more immediacy for voters and therefore they follow better what is being «debated».

Reminds me of Wendy Wright and her biggest «talking point» while debating Richard Dawkins on the subject of intelligent design vs. evolution.

This is good debating stuff, but poor science, and it won't convince intelligent people who want to focus on the facts as they can best be understood.

For example, if a science journalist presents the evolution vs. intelligent design debate on equal terms, he has objectively indicated that there is a debate.

My hope is that a person that is neutral on the issue will find a place to hear intelligent debate.

Justice Hackland commented at para 73 on the accused's demeanor, who appeared «quite naive, immature and inarticulate» despite being an intelligent physician, and was the «type of person who would «go with the flow» and avoid debate or confrontation while a guest in the home of someone who should otherwise have been confronted.»