Anyone who really think's
intelligent design happened does not need to be employed in scientific pursuits.
Not exact matches
Anyone who has spent even a part a day in a Children's Genetics Clinic knows the horrible things that
happen to perfectly innocent babies and families, and how all this «
intelligent design» goes WAY bad.
Design by an
intelligent being
Happened by random chance What are the differences between the two creators?
Is it more rational to believe the intricate
design and incomprehensibly balanced fine tuning of our universe
happened by chance, or that an
intelligent agent
designed it for a purpose?
Richard Dawkins has developed an international reputation of spreading the word that evolution
happened and that there is no «
intelligent design» or higher being, as you might gather from the title of his book «The God Delusion.»
The theory can also mean that a divine being intervenes to micromanage or introduce specific
designs into a world that would otherwise fail to achieve key steps of progress — as if to say: you've got a bicycle, but some
intelligent intervention is required to turn it into a motorcycle, since this won't
happen automatically; or, you've got a light - sensitive spot, but an external operation of considerable dexterity is required to transform this into a functional eye.
Try having an opinion of
intelligent design at some Universities and see what
happens.