That doesn't make it wrong but it doesn't make
intelligent design wrong either.
Not exact matches
Where those who push «
intelligent design» go
wrong is they distort or deny real physical evidence to promote the notion that the earth is only 5000 years old and the world we see is as it was initially created.
If you pay attention to what I wrote, I accuse both the atheist and the religious person in that «
intelligent design» conversation of anthropomorphizing intelligence and debating the point from the
wrong perspective in the first place.
Fundamentalist Chrsitians made a big mistake with this
intelligent design nonsense — it's the
wrong argument.
«Why would atheists need to provide an alternate «
intelligent design»» = > because they know suffering children is absolutely
wrong yet deny absolute right and
wrong.
«We think that
intelligent design is not, for this reason, a scientific proposal, and also — from a theological and philosophical point of view — is a
wrong answer.»