Sentences with phrase «intelligent designers»

Politicians need to start listening to the mainstream science community, not the climate cranks, anti-vaxxers, intelligent designers, anti fluoride people and so on.

It seems redundant that the perplexities of molecular mechanisms are made via a cellular blueprint followed in conjunctions of and by intelligent designers all living amid and within each and every molecular mechanisms while the base roots residencies of such super small yet very intelligent beings could very well be each and every cell's DNA.

Only the religious creationist / intelligent designers call evolution «just a theory» in that, e.g., «I have a theory; tomorrow the sky will be purple.»

We can easily use this incident as an excuse to slip into our favorite combat positions and rally around our preferred positions as young earthers, intelligent designers, theistic evolutionists, and so on.

So perhaps the intelligent designers might join Darwinian Larry in calling ME too existentialist, although John in his brilliant musings on friendship below actually is right in saying that all I'm saying is that there's an irreducible Augustinian dimension to who we are.

Ergo, are the intelligent designers dead?

Kavi Guppta Nomad and Forbes Contributor Tomas is an incredibly intelligent designer and thinker.

What genius or «intelligent designer» came up with that?

An intelligent designer would have given us a long stiff tail that reached the ground for a third point of support, a method of shielding the male reproductive organs, and a bony spur partly encircling our necks.

This faith is either in evolution (molecules to man theory not proven, but only mans» speculation at best) or creationism (God / intelligent designer as described in Bible).

lets go with that; now you have to admit that your intelligent designer, is more complex than us, thus he / she needs a designer, and so forth ad infinitum....

I don't need to conjure up an intelligent designer to know the difference between right and wrong.

I reckon if there is an intelligent designer out there, there is at least one of his / her creations which somehow slipped thru the quality control processes... the other possibility is that the evolutionary advancements of this hoser was not appropriatelly screen upon hiring, and that the proces of survival of the fitest found this out, and culled him from the herd?

Now whether that intelligent designer still cares about humans and the earth is another question.

His refusal to identify the nature of the constant (intelligent designer) in his theory makes it impossible for his claims to be verified.

in ID we say do nt wear blinders that block you to an intelligent designer.

As in intelligent design, intelligent designer?

There would be no science or anything else unless there was an intelligent designer.

Which proves to me an intelligent designer (God) is in control.

the design and slim chances for the universe to yield life are so impossibly small that it must be counted as evidence for an intelligent designer.

Following that logic, I declare that an intelligent - er designer created your intelligent designer.

This global compilation of traditional wisdom shows that none of the great, classical religious traditions conceived of God as a mere intelligent Designer, or as a First Cause within nature, or as a highly moral Personality who happens to be divine as well, or any kind of all - powerful agent that has a primus inter pares relationship with other, less powerful Superbeings and Incredibles.

There is no way you can prove / disprove that there is an intelligent designer.

It's not that we are «establishing criteria,» we are simply examining facts of life, and all of the facts point to an absence in an intelligent designer.

The intelligent designer has now become the Universe, eh?

If I were s betting man I'm going an intelligent designer.

Even if we accept the highly questionable proposition that the Big Bang had to have some intelligent designer behind it, how do we get from there to the Bible, a book written by ignorant men on one planet 13,400,000,000 years after the event?

Simply put, does a house spontaneously build itself or does it need an intelligent designer and a builder to have and implement the concept and actually build it.

The intelligent designer is not named and no claim is made that the designer is the Christian God.

Advocates of intelligent design claim that anyone can be led to belief in an intelligent designer by a scientific study of nature.

After all, their argument for intelligent design does not identify the intelligent designer as the God of any particular religion.

People find intelligent design in the natural order because they believe on other grounds in the existence of an intelligent designer.

As Christians, they assumed the existence of an intelligent designer and read the evidence drawn from the natural order through the spectacles of their Christian faith.

Leaving God unnamed does not make their argument any less theological, especially when they claim that the elements of complex design they have observed in nature are present because of the activity of their unnamed intelligent designer.

No intelligent designer, no world.

I don't care if the creator was the flying spagetti monster; it is common sense and obvious that an intelligent designer created all things.

Think about it: «natural selection» in of itself reeks of an intelligent designer... DUH!!!

On the one hand, Thomas offers an approach to intelligent design that leaves an opening for intellectuals like the columnist Charles Krauthammer, who admits he believes in some kind of intelligent design, but finds himself unable to identify the intelligent designer with any of the gods currently on offer.

Does that really sound like the work of an inconceivably powerful being, that could create the universe with all the complexity that people like to point out is a proof of an intelligent designer?

Regardless of the evidence, creationism must necessarily arrive at a single conclusion: the existence of an intelligent designer.

On the flip side, if an intelligent designer made the eyeball, why does 50 % of the world need to fix its problems?

It takes more faith to believe the complexity of life came from goo that it does in an intelligent designer — God.

If He chose to do it with a big bang, through evolution, or by breathing life into dust we still believe that their was an intelligent designer.

And how else could we explain such fine - tuning except by supposing the existence of an intelligent designer who fits organisms so precisely to their environments?

Just because SOME unintelligent things come from an intelligent designer does not mean ALL things do.

Just because life is a delicate balancing act does not PROVE there is an intelligent designer, it ONLY PROVES THAT LIFE IS A DELICATE BALANCING ACT.

So, please tell me, who's the real God, the real intelligent designer?

4) «Just because life is a delicate balancing act does not PROVE there is an intelligent designer, it ONLY PROVES THAT LIFE IS A DELICATE BALANCING ACT.»

But there is still no intelligent designer except Nature.

An intelligent designer would have used two separate ones, right?