His Honour Judge Hodge QC referred to County Personnel (Employment Agency) Ltd v Alan R Pulver & Co [1987] 1 WLR 916 at 922E, in which Bingham LJ said that: «If in the exercise of a reasonable professional judgment a solicitor is or should be alerted to risks which might elude even
an intelligent layman, then plainly it is his duty to advise the client of these risks or explore the matter further.»
What more perfect classroom is there for tutoring
the intelligent layman to be skeptical of the «known laws of science» than the stream of stupidity wrapped in obfuscating words than the hockey stick of Mann and the screaming doom from Hansem's mouth?
Why isn't there out there someone who possesses not only expertise in the science, but an awareness of the needs of
the intelligent layman?
You're one of those effective science communicators who can clarify essentials for
the intelligent layman, without leaving yourself wide open to misrepresentation.
Dogmatists, of course, don't easily change, so this stalemate may well continue until
intelligent laymen have had enough and push them off the stage.
First,
intelligent laymen must take back the debate, by pushing currently out - of - bounds science back onto center stage.
Not exact matches
There basic argument is «
intelligent design» or in
laymen's terms «something has had to create this».
Apparently there is a longing on the part of
laymen for the preacher to give an honest,
intelligent, passionate, personal presentation of Christian conviction rather than the coldly rational, dispassionate presentation of objective truth.
Such a team consists of a carefully selected and trained group of
laymen including a stable A.A. member and an Al - Anon member, a lawyer, a physician, and other
intelligent, warmhearted persons with a dedication to following the Great Physician.