Sentences with phrase «intelligent people in»

By: Marc Morano — Climate Depot Climate Depot publisher Marc Morano's statement on President Elect Donald J. Trump: Morano: «Climate sanity has been restored to the U.S. No longer do we have to hear otherwise intelligent people in charge in DC blather on about how UN treaties or EPA regulations will control the Earth's temperature -LSB-...]

This is not to say that successful and intelligent people in other fields can not be successful traders, in fact this is obviously not the case it all, I am just trying to emphasize the fact that intelligence and previous accomplishments do not really matter at all when it comes to trading.

We have very intelligent people in education I believe, and I think this is bigger than the occupational health and safety perspective, it's about the nature of the way that we do teaching and learning in Australia.

American Mensa and Match.com have teamed up to provide a dating experience exclusively for Mensa members, as well as provide all Match members access to some of the most intelligent people in the nation.

We see so many intelligent people in society that can not get along with others.

Jay, theres no doubt he is intelligent, but as some of the most intelligent people in the world, he is disconnected from reality.

youre an imbecile - atheists are the most intelligent people in the world - they re the few who escaped the brainwashing of religion

These were some of the most intelligent people in history.

From Robert E. A. Lee, writer of «Inherit the Wind» and «Auntie Mame»: «The «media «is a collection of very intelligent people in a very difficult situation.

some of the most intelligent people in history to espouse that view of existence brought that criticism to bear.

On the talent point, there are a lot of intelligent people in Austin with an action - oriented mindset who have worked in tech companies big and small.

Not exact matches

In other words, they hypothesize that taller people are inherently more intelligent than shorter people.

Emotionally intelligent people know these phrases are off limits in casual conversation because people take them the wrong way.

Emotionally intelligent people separate their thoughts from the facts in order to escape the cycle of negativity and move toward a positive, new outlook.

Emotionally intelligent people know that success lies in their ability to rise in the face of failure, and they can't do this when they're living in the past.

So, I went back to the data to uncover the kinds of things that emotionally intelligent people are careful to avoid in order to keep themselves calm, content, and in control.

Mulvey & Banani's tag line is «well connected,» referring to not only its work designing intelligent building systems that connect people in a physical sense but also its network of like - minded architects, designers, owners, developers, property managers and project managers.

«I think all of us are very bright, intelligent people — but we have, to different degrees, limited experiences in all the aspects that are necessary to run a successful business,» Chapin explains.

«Most people can see patterns, but highly intelligent people see them more quickly, and they often see patterns in everything,» writes a gifted specialist on Quora.

Confirmation bias is the primary reason why otherwise intelligent people get caught up in asset bubbles that are obvious in the unforgiving light that comes the morning after.

It might take a while for some of these companies to have $ 20 billion in revenue, but I see a much more robust crop of serious companies that are well financed that are run by intelligent people and are tapped into the trends of where technology is going.»

You can't expect to bring in business, maintain satisfied customers, and innovate without a team of ambitious, intelligent people.

Some of the calmest, most peaceful, intelligent people I've ever met are doing life in the penitentiary.

You may be wondering: How is it possible for people as intelligent as the Bitcoin Core developers to fail to see the obvious mistakes in their thinking?

What other similar scenario would have intelligent people investing in further development of this?

I have always wondered if innovation required some rare gene mutation, or whether I might be missing a simple formula for unlocking the ability in any intelligent business person to innovate.

The 500 - person AI research team will use the data Xiaomi has collected over the years from various devices to improve its in - house intelligent assistant, Xiao AI.

But it's a field where a lot of intelligent people are trying to get big in.

So a large number of good and smart people in good faith developed an investing strategy that they thought was supported by the peer - reviewed research but in reality was the OPPOSITE of what the peer - reviewed research would support once all the peer - reviewed research needed to make intelligent choices had been published.

The market is full of driven and intelligent people trying to outguess each other in the short run.

If you have been reading personal finance website for awhile, you may have noticed a trend towards ridiculing those who make intelligent financial decisions by constructing this fictional «average person» and describing how some handicap would prevent this «average person» from being able to share in that success.

It allows me to think and put my thoughts together and put it out there and get feedback from very intelligent people so it helps my training in that way.

Some very intelligent people, if they had to run a simple business like a Dunkin' Donuts franchise, would be bankrupt in a year.

I think that, in most instances, groups of intelligent people have so many inherent liabilities that a lone individual has a far better chance of making good decisions.

«In general, it's hard to get intelligent people to agree on stuff that is hated and unloved and in meaningful quantitieIn general, it's hard to get intelligent people to agree on stuff that is hated and unloved and in meaningful quantitiein meaningful quantities.

You consider it «intelligent discourse» when people insist on reinterpreting and explaining away the lived experiences of marginalized people, as if they are in a position to understand those experiences better than the people actually living through them?

Meanwhile, religion becomes increasingly reactionary & fanatical in response, which drives away intelligent people even quicker.

You consider it «intelligent discourse» when people question whether people «REALLY» see their race when they look in the mirror, despite the fact that there are quotes from people who say, yes they really do see their race?

You don't have to believe in intelligent design to see how there is harassment and discrimination against people for their beliefs.

Quite frankly, I'm not interested in any «intelligent discourse which is little more than a circle jerk of a discussion where privileged people sit around and abstractly theorize about what the «real problems» of and «solutions to» marginalized people's problems that doesn't center the words and experiences of actual marginalized people and their own understanding of their own problems.

There aren't many intelligent, loving people who are religious (in my life, I've found literally ONE and he's a priest and a relative, so I'm biased — otherwise it would be zero).

Colin is obviously a critical thinker who is far to intelligent to be judged by the likes of people who believe in a imaginary god and as $ backwards religious book that promotes hate and bigotry.

They believe in events that intelligent people don't.

So are you trying to make an intelligent argument for gay marriage advocacy or just trying to prove a billion and a half people wrong and anger them in the process?

It's nice to see that there are some clear - headed, intelligent, progressive people in the Catholic faith who understand that thousand - year old doctrines don't always translate into appropriate, actionable advice in the modern world.

Its funny how supposedly intelligent people can still believe in this sort of thing... May all being have piece and happiness...

In speaking of a man as a «person,» we mean that he is an intelligent being, acting individually for himself.

No truly intelligent person can honestly believe in such BS.

zealous belief in ANYTHING (or in the absense of an anything) is not good, intelligent people make good choices based on the information available and realize that everything is not perfect no matter what precept you prescribe to.

There was a time when I was, independently, reading Behe and all about intelligent design and was thoroughly involved in debating «evolutionists» and arguing with people accusing them of thinking only within the «trance» of science.