There are
intelligent people on all sides of this discussion.
furthermore, that ignores a very broad field of scholarship which often speaks to the contrary (again, exposing the fact that there are very
intelligent people on BOTH sides of the biblical debate here).
I find that there are
intelligent people on both sides of this equation as well as those who have suffered on both sides of the equation.
Not exact matches
Christians have voted to put their God's name
on everyones money, add «Under God» to the flag salute, force schools to teach
intelligent design with absolutely no scientific basis along
side the sciences, voted to write their moral laws
on the fronts of public courthouses and tax funded buildings, voted to ban certain
people from living together, being intimate or raising children because their orientation didn't fit with their bible beliefs.
I learned in seminary that there will always be
people more
intelligent than me
on both
sides of that debate.
This is an absolutely asinine move
on this guys» part and insulting to
intelligent and thoughful
people on both
sides of this issue.
Thank goodness there are some
intelligent ppl on the atheist
side of the argument that do not let their egos and emotions control them like her.
Per is very slow, I wish he was faster atimes but
ppl under rate him a lot and please football is not all about pace; Per plays with his brains and we tend to applaud players who play with more aggression unfortunately he doesn't; I will use an eg, if it was Per marking Hazard instead of Koscielny in d build up to the chelsea penalty, he would have probably gone backwards trying to stay
on d right
side of hazard so he doesn't shoot and narrowing d angle so that our goalie easily picks up d ball, that's how Per plays and to me that's subtle but
intelligent option in that scenario but that style of play doesn't get plenty credit.
they will need a new Head coach / manager to be able to listen to their opinion since they have been involves them in football but in wenger's case the bucks stop to him which is not right at all Ivan is very
intelligent guy like the way he put it «we need new infrastructure» which states we cant have a whole club direction
on football
side on single
person hands those are things of the past and they have been proven for over 10 years not practically working!
Except it obviously isntvthT ckeaevas there are highly
intelligent qualified
people on both
sides who can't all be dismissed as hacks.
Through interviews and performances featuring
people on either
side of the issue — including Mel Brooks, Sarah Silverman, Louis C.K., Joan Rivers, Chris Rock, and Abe Foxman — as well as a portrait of a resilient survivor, The Last Laugh offers an
intelligent and hilarious survey of what is and is not off - limits in comedy, from the Holocaust and beyond.
People on all sides have said intelligent and insightful things, and people on all sides have said asinine t
People on all
sides have said
intelligent and insightful things, and
people on all sides have said asinine t
people on all
sides have said asinine things.
Overall, while I don't necessarily fully agree with Pielke (see, I can disagree with far more
intelligent people than me
on both
sides of the table with no shame what - so - ever!)
This thread (and many others) is full of
intelligent people that can and do come down
on both
sides of almost every argument.