Sentences with phrase «intended purpose of the test»
At the 2017 Performance Matters» National Learners Conference, we are excited to offer a pre-conference option to support districts in using our solutions to evaluate the item - level statistics to ensure that the items support the intended purpose of the test, which begins to build the argument for valid inferences.
http://www.performancematters.com/ Not exact matches
The purpose of the practice tests is for students to become familiar with the CBT system, functionality, and item types; the practice tests are not intended to guide classroom instruction.
However, it seems that they first need a lesson on the intended purposes, workings and consequences of these tests for students and teachers.
Site users are prohibited from violating or attempting to violate the security of this Site, including without limitation: (1) accessing data not intended for such user or logging onto a server or an account which the user is not authorized to access; (2) using this Site for unintended purposes or trying to change the behavior of this Site; (3) attempting to probe, scan or test the vulnerability of a system or network or breach security or authentication measures without proper authorization; (4) attempting to interfere with service to any user, host or network, including without limitation, via means of submitting a virus to this Site, overloading, «flooding,» «spamming,» «mailbombing» or «crashing»; (5) forging any TCP / IP packet header or any part of the header information in any e-mail or newsgroup posting; and (6) forging communications on behalf of this Site (impersonating this site) or to this Site (impersonating a legitimate user).
For the purpose of this initial study, we tested products intended for large dogs, generally 50 - 85 pounds.
What is necessary is to accumulate a bunch of independent tests to confirm that the predictions are reliable enough for the intended purposes.
As Advocate General Bobek explained, even though «[t] he first port of call in any interpretative exercise is the text of the provision,» which here would seem to support EFfCI's reading, and although one can not «simply ignore the text and set sail on the foggy sea of effet utile,» in this case the context and purpose of the Cosmetics Regulation confirmed the fact that it was intended to discourage more than just animal testing done with the «intent» of complying with EU rules (AG's Opinion paras 77 - 78).
This means, as the Advocate General pointed out, that whether or not a product is intended for specifically military purposes depends on an objective test and is not dependent on use by the military, but by the characteristics of the product.
The basic test comes down to the simple, if not obvious one of deciding what is the real purpose of the contract, the true benefit intended to be obtained by the injured party, the extent to which the misperformance by the defendant goes beyond falling short of what was desired by the victim of the breach and involves the complete denial to him of any benefit from the performance that was provided.
The CJEU adopted the opinion of the Advocate General in this case, stating that the intended purpose of the software (i.e., whether its purpose falls within a medical purpose as prescribed by the regulations) and the function that the software performs on the data (i.e., analytics, learning and decision - making) are key tests in determining whether the relevant software is a medical device or not.
By confirming a low threshold for the first - stage purposes test, the Court has ensured that virtually all purposes will pass the first stage and be considered on the basis of the fairness of the use, not the intended purpose (which is itself only one of the six factors in the second - stage test).
In his statement of defence, Dr. Koren denied the claims, arguing the tests were «accurate and reliable for their intended purpose» of providing clinical information «relevant to the medical care and safety of children.»
Beyond the ethics of capturing the Facebook profiles of millions of users by offering them a personality test, the commercial use of that data contradicts an impression that the database was intended for academic purposes only.
the application of the registration test was never intended to have any purpose beyond determining whether an application would have the status of a «registered» claim entitling the applicants to procedural rights in relation to future acts.