Thus, we must be mindful of the water intensity of our energy supplies, as well as the energy
intensity of our water supplies, as we address drought and climate change.
Not exact matches
Nevertheless, shifts in the location,
intensity, and variability
of both rain and snow will likely have a greater impact on regional
water supplies than glacier retreat will.
«There is a bright side to this conclusion» according to the Goddard Institute for Space Studies» James Hansen, lead author on the study, «by following a path that leads to a lower CO2 amount we can alleviate a number
of problems that had begun to seem inevitable, such as increased storm
intensities, expanded desertification, loss
of coral reefs, and loss
of mountain glaciers that
supply fresh
water to hundreds
of millions
of people.»
As a result we risk expanding desertification, food shortages, increased storm
intensities, loss
of coral reefs and the disappearance
of mountain glaciers that
supply water to hundreds
of millions
of people.
One
of the harshest charges against fracking, often leveled with apocalyptic
intensity by its foes, is that it indiscriminately contaminates vital drinking
water supplies.
At 600ppm, global average temperature rise could be in the range
of 3 - 4Â °C — which means greater sea level rise than predicted, glaciers melting and constraining
water supply throughout large areas
of Asia, agriculture being severely stressed in many places, greater storm
intensity, reduced biodiversity, the end
of coral reefs.
Higher elevation areas could experience altered
water flow in some river basins if current rates
of glacial retreat continue, but shifts in the location,
intensity, and variability
of rain and snow due to climate change will likely have a greater impact on regional
water supplies.