Some are done with
the intention of prosecution or determining liability, others are purely for learning and others are a hybrid.
Not exact matches
While there was support for the
prosecution's case that the defendants had formed a plan to go to Pakistan to train and then to Afghanistan to fight, there was nothing that evidenced expressly the use
of, or
intention to use, the extremist literature to incite each other to do so.
In my view, those references to the inventor's
intention refer to an objective manifestation
of that intent in the patent claims, as interpreted by the person skilled in the art, and do not contemplate extrinsic evidence such as statements or admissions made in the course
of patent
prosecution.
(ii) The matters to be dealt with are: - the aggravating and mitigating factors
of the offence (not personal mitigation); - any statutory provisions relevant to the offender and the offence under consideration so that the judge is made aware
of any statutory limitations on sentencing; - any relevant sentencing guidelines and guideline cases; - identifying any victim personal statement or other information available to the
prosecution advocate about the impact
of the offence on the victim; - where appropriate, any evidence
of the impact
of the offending on a community; - an indication, where applicable,
of an
intention to apply for any ancillary orders, such as anti-social behaviour orders and confiscation orders, and so far as possible, indicating the nature
of the order to be sought.
In particular, the case
of Ellames [1974] 3 All ER 130, [1974] 1 WLR 1391 established that «has with him any article for use...» means «has with him for the purpose (or with the
intention) that they will be used...», and that the
prosecution has to prove that the defendant has the articles for the purpose
of use in a future offence, by him, or another, though it is not necessary to establish the details
of a particular contemplated fraud.
The attraction
of an
intention to deceive is that it avoids the problems
of proving dishonesty and does not require proof
of actual deception, although this could
of course buttress a
prosecution.
We will provide you with access to your personal information on reasonable request and subject to your agreement to pay our access charges if (a) it is practicable for us to do so and we have no other reasonable grounds for refusing access, (b) the request is not frivolous or vexatious, (c) access will not have an unreasonable impact on the privacy
of others, (d) the information does not relate to existing or anticipated legal proceedings (other than information accessible through the discovery process), (e) access will not reveal our
intentions in relation to any negotiations with you, (f) access is not unlawful (g) denying access is not required or authorised by law, and (h) access will not prejudice any prevention, detection, investigation or
prosecution of possible unlawful or improper activity.