Sentences with phrase «intentional fraud»

This is not the case in Texas or anywhere that allows treble damages (3x multiplier +) for intentional fraud claims.

There's no allegation of intentional fraud, The Times points out.

At the same time, PGS proponents believe that we must start with a foundation of trust and that organic farmers who make a public declaration to uphold the Principles of Organic Agriculture can, in fact, be trusted, and that intentional fraud accounts for only a minority of non-compliances.

Other retractions reflect intentional fraud.

In other words, there is no contractual rate, no contractual financial terms at all, and contrast that absence with the contract language that purports to take away your legal right to any redress other than recalculating the amount due, even in case of intentional fraud.

«I don't think public entities should be held to such low standard that all we do is make sure they're not found liable for intentional fraud,» Lungren said.

A medicine or dietary supplement might be incorrectly labeled for a variety of reasons — intentional fraud, poor manufacturing practices and degradation due to poor storage or post-expiration date.

While Baker's latest blog looks at charter schools in multiple states, the Connecticut data he presents makes the strongest case yet for the intentional fraud being perpetrated on Connecticut's public schools, our students, teachers, state government and taxpayers.

Willard, yeah, but would cost a lot more money... jest aside, of course you can not «uncommit» a massive, intentional fraud.

Significant and intentional fraud are the ones that get the most attention, but there are many other problems that arise in research that will also skew the results in the ways that cause preconceived results, even if it is only by not being careful enough.

The Court rejected the doctor's arguments that the statutory immunity is limited to initial appointment decisions, and that he could prevail by establishing the governing body's decision was not supported by good cause or valid reasons without a showing of intentional fraud.

if the other party is damaged and it appears you did the wrongdoing, do you believe a jury is going to appropriately ponder the legal nuance between negligence or intentional fraud?