Sentences with phrase «interaction as a predictor»

Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent - family interactions as predictors of young adults» states of mind regarding attachment.

Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent — family interactions as predictors of young adults» states of mind regarding attachment

Prenatal representations of family in parents and coparental interactions as predictors of triadic interactions during infancy.

Not exact matches

Collaboration and interaction among students have long been viewed as important factors in improving student achievement, and participation in study groups is a good predictor of success in college.

For 40 years, the University of Washington psychology professor and his team of researchers at the Gottman Institute have studied couples» interactions to determine the key predictors of divorce — or as Gottman calls them, «the four horsemen of the apocalypse.»

However, the interaction between DRD2 and DRD4 again emerges as a significant predictor (b =.656, p =.004).

Examples of negative interactions include another predictor of divorce, The Four Horsemen, as well as feelings of loneliness and isolation.

For this analysis, the criterion was relationship satisfaction, and the predictors were age, gender, differences in motives, differences in capabilities, psychological connectedness to the future as well as the interactions between these differences and psychological connectedness to the future.

Also the interaction terms were inserted as predictors.

In Step 2, interactions (or cross products) between (a) adolescent - reported parenting style and gender (coded 0 for females, 1 for males) and (b) adolescent - reported parenting style and age were entered as predictors (Aiken & West, 1991).

At first a regression model with the general relationship satisfaction scale as the criterion and seven predictors: the Triangular Love sub-scales (Passion, Commitment, Intimacy) a dummy sex variable (men participants coded 0 as the reference group, and women coded as 1), and the interaction terms between the sex variable and the love sub-scales.

This finding contradicts several studies that claim that experiences of aggression in the family of origin, either as a victim or witness, are strong predictors for the recurrence of this pattern of interaction in intimate relationships (Chiodo et al., 2012; Makin - Byrd & Bierman, 2013; Rivera - Rivera et al., 2007).

Table 3 reviews the regression results when shame, gender, and their interaction served as predictors.

For 40 years, the University of Washington psychology professor and his team at the Gottman Institute have studied couples» interactions to determine the key predictors of divorce — or as Gottman calls them, «the four horsemen of the apocalypse.»

For the subsequent interaction models, two age interaction terms were added as additional predictors (see Models 2 in Table 2).

The research that does exist focuses on clinical issues associated with romantic love such as hypomania, sleep problems, depression, and anxiety (Bajoghli, Joshaghani, Mohammadi, Holsboer - Trachsler, & Brand, 2011; Bajoghli et al., 2014; Bajoghli et al., 2013; Brand et al., 2015), determinants of marital satisfaction (e.g., frequency of positive interactions; Tadinac et al., 2012), and maladaptive schemas as a predictor of divorce (Yoosefi, Etemadi, Bahrami, Fatehizade, & Ahmadi, 2010).

Child age and a family variable were added next as predictors into the regression, and the age by family functioning interaction was added into the final block.

Finally, because negative marital quality may predict increased alcohol use rather than the reverse, we estimated an APIM in which actor negative marital quality, partner negative marital quality, gender, and all possible two - way and three - way interactions were included as predictors of average drinks per week in Wave 2, controlling for average drinks per week in Wave 1.

The internalizing x externalizing interaction factor was a statistically significant predictor of the intercept for dichotomous variables when it was specified at W1, W2, W4, and W5, βs = − 11.80 to − 3.23, ps < 0.05, and the nature of this interaction was similar to that described in our main analysis with W3 specified as the intercept.

Thus, although we considered communication styles as predictors of sexual peer norm perceptions in the analyses, we were not able to assess whether the peer interactions affected youths» individual perceptions of sexual norms, or whether these individual perceptions of sexual peer norms may have affected the way in which youth talked about sex with their friends.

Parent - adolescent relationship qualities, internal working models, and attachment styles as predictors of adolescents» interactions with friends

First we conducted an additional analysis in the multilevel models that included a four - category couple drinking variable and gender as well as the interaction between gender and couple drinking categories as the predictors.

However, for crucial 3 - way interactions (e.g., between race, gender, and internalizing symptoms in the CMHI study), it is important to include the three 2 - way interactions between those 3 variables as possible predictors.

[jounal] Nickerson, A. B / 2008 / Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions / Journal of school Psychology 46 (6): 687 ~ 703

Although the proposed internalizing x externalizing interaction was also not supported as a predictor of growth in amount of use for users (frequency of marijuana use and quantity x frequency of alcohol use), there was evidence for internalizing symptoms as a protective first - order effect on the intercepts of these outcomes.

For the dispositional predictors, only the provider's own score and the interaction with gender was used, as we did not formulate hypotheses about the impact of the support seeker's dispositional empathy on the provider's observed support provision.

Attachment security, mother — child interaction, and temperament as predictors of behavior - problem ratings at age three years

The current study examined two emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal and affective suppression, in interaction with self - report and biological measures of emotional reactivity as predictors of internalizing symptoms.

The second example of post-hoc probing involves a two - way interaction of two continuous variables and is based on an analysis of observational data (as predictors) and teacher - report grades (as an outcome).

For example, if one were interested in whether the association between a parenting variable (e.g., father psychological control; Holmbeck, Shapera, & Hommeyer, in press) and an outcome (e.g., school grades) is moderated by group status (e.g., spina bifida vs. an able - bodied comparison sample), one would test the interaction of psychological control and group as a predictor of school grades after controlling for the parenting and group main effects.

Regulatory focus manipulation (coded 0: prevention, +1: promotion), commitment scores and the respective interaction were entered as predictors, with initial attraction as the criterion (Model 1).

Then, we included these three interaction terms as predictors into the level - 1 equation.

Social integration and affectionate social interactions have a substantial influence on individual stress resilience (Robles and Kiecolt - Glaser, 2003), health (Uchino, 2006; Thoits, 2011) and longevity (House et al., 1988; Holt - Lunstad et al., 2010), making couple relationships, as the most prominent social relationship for nearly all adults, an important predictor of quality of life and health (Proulx et al., 2007).

As shown in Table III, all three psychosocial predictors of metabolic control remained significant in the simultaneous regression equation as did the self - care by age interaction, suggesting that their relations were independent of one anotheAs shown in Table III, all three psychosocial predictors of metabolic control remained significant in the simultaneous regression equation as did the self - care by age interaction, suggesting that their relations were independent of one anotheas did the self - care by age interaction, suggesting that their relations were independent of one another.

As expected, over a twenty - seven - month period, the best predictor of outcomes was the DRD4 × Family Risk × AIM interaction, with the impact of the intervention greatest for youth from contexts of high family risk who had the long - allele genotype.

Parenting behavior and functioning have also been examined as predictors of trajectories of early problem behavior, and some data support the interaction of parenting and self - regulation as significant predictors of patterns of problematic behavior and ongoing problems with the regulation of affect.