Sentences with phrase «interaction effect of condition»

Not exact matches

The fractional effect is a sign of very strong interactions among the electrons, a condition that can lead to a variety of surprising phenomena and which marks the conceptual frontier in condensed matter physics.

One of the main elements that makes it extremely difficult for no - excuses schools to allow this kind of interaction is that it requires open exchanges between students in informal settings; failing this condition, the peer interactions do not have the same effect while in school (Erwin, 1993).

As predicted, there was no immediate effect of the interaction between condition and transportation on empathy T2 (β =.03, ns).

Sound effects include walking, vehicular engines, interaction with objects and ambience such as weather conditions as well as the groans of nearby walkers, flies buzzing, birds tweeting and more besides.

A 2 (framing: loss vs. foregone - gain) × 2 (social norm: no - norm vs. with - norm) ANOVA performed on the data revealed a significant main effect of framing, F (1,1196) = 6.438, p =.011, r =.073, with larger emission cuts in the foregone - gain than the loss condition, a significant main effect of social norm, F (1,1196) = 13.904, p <.001, r =.107, with larger emission cuts in the with - norm than the no - norm condition, together with a significant interaction, F (1,1196) = 4.363, p =.037.

Nevertheless, it may be difficult to extrapolate our results to natural conditions as we (1) have not considered potential changes in biotic interactions (Sentis et al., 2013), (2) did not quantitatively assess changes in host plant quality due to heat stress and only included low relative humidity as an additional factor (Bauerfeind and Fischer, 2013a), (3) did not consider effects of different host plants (Bauerfeind and Fischer, 2013b), and (4) did not apply temperature variation in the adult stage.

Forster et al. (2007) described four mechanisms by which volcanic forcing influences climate: RF due to aerosol — radiation interaction; differential (vertical or horizontal) heating, producing gradients and changes in circulation; interactions with other modes of circulation, such as El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO); and ozone depletion with its effects on stratospheric heating, which depends on anthropogenic chlorine (stratospheric ozone would increase with a volcanic eruption under low - chlorine conditions).

No significant interaction of intervention condition (control vs full) with the attrition variable was found for effects on related fifth - grade measures, reinforcing the internal validity of the study with respect to all comparisons of the full intervention and control groups.

In an additional test of attrition effects, the interaction of intervention condition with attrition was assessed with respect to each outcome variable reported inTable 3 by examining attrition - by - condition interaction effects on corresponding measures at fifth - grade entry.

A significant effect of regulation condition was qualified by a significant Age Group × Regulation Condition interaction (see Figure 1b).

Next, we conducted a whole brain comparison for the two emotional processing conditions, the main and interaction effects of which are discussed below.

There was no significant main effect of prime condition (F = 0.625, p = 0.434), target valence (F = 0.056, p = 0.814), attachment style (F = 0.062, p = 0.804) or any possible interaction on the accuracy of the responses.

For the interaction analysis, the average percent signal change was extracted from the significant cluster for each condition using MarsBar (Brett et al., 2002) to examine the direction of the response; following this, the SPSS 16.0 was used to conduct a simple effect analysis.

Another significant interaction not accounted for by control variables was observed for maternal prenatal smoking and family income, indicating more serious effects of maternal prenatal smoking under relatively low - income, conditions.

We also found significant pretest by condition interaction effects on teacher reports of skills associated with executive function, including inhibitory control and shift (cognitive flexibility), and on teacher reported internalizing and externalizing behavior.

For most of the variables, CU levels and ODD had an independent effect cross-sectionally and longitudinally (only one interaction was significant), which means that both conditions merit independent clinical attention.