Sentences with phrase «interactions than negative»

The common thread Gottman found that predicts divorce so well is weaved into it, and it is this: for a marriage to be stable, you must have lots more positive interactions than negative interactions.

In an article published this week in Business Insider, Hannah Fry, a math whiz who works for at the UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London, breaks down happily ever after in this formula, developed by another mathematician based on research at The Gottman Institute: The longest - lasting couples felt they had more positive interactions than negative ones on a daily basis, while those with the least longevity generally feel their negative interactions are more common than happy ones.

A couple that has at least five times more positive interactions than negative ones will ultimately succeed.

You need to have more positive interactions than negative ones to maintain a happy, stable marriage.

We need to have many more positive interactions than negative ones to maintain a healthy relationship.

Dr. Gottman says that the ideal, happy, and successful relationships produce five times more positive interactions than negatives.

Not exact matches

Pages that posted even less frequently than a post per week got 1.82 % negative feedback out of all the interactions.

I understand that every interaction you have with someone with a «Christian» label on themselves will shape your view of Christianity as a whole, but I would encourage you to keep in mind that the negative experiences often aren't representative of the whole, and that they will be much more memorable to you than perhaps dozens of interactions you have had with Christians who treated you well.

ex couples actually demonstrated more positive (and fewer negative) behaviors during their interactions than did married couples.»

«If they have that sense of self, even if they do encounter some negative peer interaction, they will be able to bounce back and have a little more resiliency than some of the other kids who maybe didn't have that growing up.»

In a national sample of approximately 1500 adults older than 50, negative social interactions were associated with a greater risk for hypertension among women and individuals ages 51 to 64.

Therefore, climate change may have a more negative effect on the biological diversity of animals than previously assumed,» says Schleuning, and he adds, «A consideration of biotic interactions between animals and plants is therefore important for predicting the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.»

It was found that men had a stronger connection between the amygdala and the area of the brain that is involved in cognitive processes (including perception, emotions, and social interactions) creating a more analytical than emotional approach when processing negative emotions.

Foods as medicine are great for people that already are on medications as they are less likely to have negative interactions than herbs and other natural supplements.

Teachers should focus more time, attention, and energy on acknowledging responsible behavior than on responding to misbehavior — what I call a high ratio of positive to negative interactions.

No one wants to hire a downtrodden, negative employee, and an easy way to showcase yourself in a negative light is by expressing anything less than positivity during your interactions with a potential employer.

In today's climate, more than ever, soft skills are proving to be the difference between positive and negative police encounters and other interactions with the criminal justice system.

More than 13 positive interactions for every 1 negative interaction could decrease productivity.

One way to tell is whether you have more negative everyday interactions than positive ones, says Diana Kirschner, PhD, author of Sealing the Deal: The Love Mentor's Guide To Lasting Love.

Couple's therapy can help break the cycle of negative interactions and allow emotional bonds to be rebuilt stronger than ever.

In other words, when children are exposed to positive attitudes, they will experience better outcomes than children who see negative interactions between their parents.

The ORs for the treatment × negative affect interactions were 2.6 for BWL, 0.59 for CBTgsh, and 0.84 for IPT, for which a ratio greater than 1 favors low negative affect.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

Happy couples have positive interactions most of the time — or five times more than negative interactions, to be exact.

Greater cell phone use has been associated with greater loneliness and poorer social skills than for those who have more face - to - face communication interactions.1 For example, a survey of over 3,400 North American girls aged 8 - 12 years old found that the more social media use, text messaging, and cell phone / video use the girls had, the more negative their social well - being (e.g., less healthy friendships).2 Even among strangers, having a cell phone (vs. notepad) on a desk during a «get - to - know - you» conversation was related to less closeness and lower relationship quality after the discussion.

3) Mothers» emotional communication was related to the degree to which children displayed positive affect with peers: Mothers who were low in derisive humor, criticality and intrusiveness had children whose peer interaction tended to have higher levels of laughter and joy than mothers who were higher in these negative parenting behaviors.

If there are more negative interactions than positive ones, it is important to think about what is happening in your life and how you could make it less stressful.

However, in our own research we found that all three styles (which we called Avoiders, Validators, and Volatiles) were functional — stable and happy — if and only if the ratio of positive to negative interaction during conflict was greater than or equal to 5:1.

Mindfulness is hypothesized to break the cycle of repetitive, negative thoughts, and to allow parents, in interaction with their child, to attend to their child, rather than to their inner ruminations.

So be mindful to use your interactions to cultivate positive mental states rather than negative.

Having many more negative interactions than positive ones may have you questioning your relationship.

For every negative interaction there is less than one positive interaction.

Therefore, Stanley founded that for both genders negative interaction led to higher divorce rates, for previously divorced couples the top arguments starter was, children, followed by money, both genders said that males tend to withdraw more than females, and more committed couples thought less about being with other people.

The hypotheses stated: the higher the negative interaction with one another, the higher rating of divorce potential the couple faces, couples who state that one of the individuals withdraw will be characterized by greater levels of negative interaction and dissatisfaction, men typically withdraw more than females do, money is the number one issue couples argue about, and more committed couples with think less likely about what it would feel like to be in another relationship and feel less trapped and more satisfied (Stanley, 2002).

There are clearly more negative than positive interactions in this kind of relationship.

Of course, this body of research does not really explain why certain behaviours are problematic or stressors for parents and families.2 Moreover, parent distress may be the antecedent rather than the outcome of child behaviour problems: High parent distress is associated with less optimal parenting and more negative parent - child interaction which, in turn, predicts child behaviour problems.

I'm constantly amazed at how much more energy goes into negative interactions like complaining, insulting and criticizing: so much more than into positive, supportive and affirming communications.

Rather than just steering clear of negative interactions, they actively work to build positivity into their relationships.

A close examination of this two - way interaction revealed that the decrease in physical attraction in the negative condition was more pronounced than the negligible increase in physical attraction in the positive condition.

[1], [2] Depressed mothers are more likely than non-depressed mothers to have poor parenting skills and to have negative interactions with their children.

These results are consistent with studies detecting gender differences in emotional responses to unhappy marriages; women are more likely than men to acknowledge and respond to negative interactions (Carstensen et al., 1995).

These results suggest that some self - reported gender differences may be the result of wives more negative cognitive strategies and self - statements, rather than actual behavior, underscoring the need for direct observation to examine marital interaction in the context of depression (Almeida & Kessler, 1998; Beach et al., 2014).

Regarding expressivity, we expected that parent - child dyads with AD children would particularly show less positive emotions, but also more negative emotions during interactions than parent - child dyads with non-AD children.

Finally, because negative marital quality may predict increased alcohol use rather than the reverse, we estimated an APIM in which actor negative marital quality, partner negative marital quality, gender, and all possible two - way and three - way interactions were included as predictors of average drinks per week in Wave 2, controlling for average drinks per week in Wave 1.

For support and negative interaction in early to middle adolescence, the data supported the parent effect model more than the friend effect model, whereas both models were equally strong in middle to late adolescence.

The results revealed that (1) for females and males, higher levels of depressive symptoms correlated with a more depressive attributional style; (2) females and males who met diagnostic criteria for a current depressive disorder evidenced more depres - sogenic attributions than psychiatric controls, and never and past depressed adolescents; (3) although no sex differences in terms of attributional patterns for positive events, negative events, or for positive and negative events combined emerged, sex differences were revealed on a number of dimensional scores; (4) across the Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire (CASQ) subscale and dimensional scores, the relation between attributions and current self - reported depressive symptoms was stronger for females than males; and (5) no Sex × Diagnostic Group Status interaction effects emerged for CASQ subscale or dimensional scores.

As such, being stuck in either positive or negative emotions, is what is thought to be problematic, even more so than the average amount of positive or negative emotions expressed during interactions (Granic 2005; Houben et al. 2015).

These findings suggest that a high parental focus on negative feelings during parent — child interaction can stimulate, rather than relieve, social - emotional problems in children.

Parent - child dyads with AD children were less able to adequately manage positive and negative emotions during interactions than healthy dyads.

In contrast with our expectations, parent - child dyads with AD children did not express less positive affect or more negative affect during conflict interactions than dyads with healthy children.